Yet another Zwane faux pas - Minister of Mineral Resources may bring an ailing industry to its knees!

20th July 2017

Yet another Zwane faux pas - Minister of Mineral Resources may bring an ailing industry to its knees!

On 15 June 2017, the Minister of Mineral Resources (Minister) published the Broad-Based Socio Economic Empowerment Charter for the South African Mining Industry, 2017 (Mining Charter III) under the auspices of section 100(2)(a) of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act, 2002 (MPRDA).

Subsequent to its publication, the Chamber of Mines (CoM) brought an urgent application to interdict the Minister, his delegates and officials, the Department of Mineral Resources (DMR) and its officials from implementing and applying Mining Charter III "in any way, directly or indirectly" (Interdict) pending the finalisation of a judicial review application.

On 14 July 2017, the CoM announced that it, together with the Minister and the DMR had reached an agreement under which the Minister and the DMR have undertaken not to implement or apply the provisions of Mining Charter III, in any way, pending judgment in relation to the Interdict. The Minister furthermore undertook that, in the event of any breach of the above undertaking, the CoM may set-down the Interdict for hearing on 48 hours' notice to the Minister. The CoM, DMR and the Minister have requested a special hearing date in respect of the Interdict and anticipate that the application will be heard in September 2017.

Earlier today, the Minister published a notice in the Government Gazette under the auspices of section 49 of the MPRDA advising of his intention to impose a moratorium on:

This moratorium will, however, not apply to applications for new rights, renewal of existing rights and applications under section 11 of the MPRDA, received and accepted before 19 July 2017, subject to the condition that such applications, if granted, will not immediately be subject to the requirements of Mining Charter III.[2] .

The Minister has granted interested and affected stakeholders until 4 August 2017 to submit representations to his Deputy Director-General.

Under section 49(1) of the MPRDA stipulates that the Minister may, after inviting representations from relevant stakeholders:

Furthermore, the Minister is obligated to consider "national interest, the strategic nature of the mineral in question and the need to promote the sustainable development of the nation’s mineral resources" in reaching his decision to apply the moratorium. It is difficult to understand how this radical step on the part of the Minister may be justified as being in the "national interest" or "promot[ing] the sustainable development of the nation's mineral resources".

In any event, we are of the view that section 49 cannot be interpreted so broadly by the Minister so as to impose a moratorium throughout South Africa and in respect of all minerals for an indefinite period. Section 49 specifically states that any moratorium imposed must be in respect of specific land, minerals and time period as "identified by the Minister". Thus, it would be overly broad application of the Minister's powers should he apply a moratorium across South Africa for all minerals for an indefinite period.

Section 49(2) goes on to state that "a notice contemplated in subsection(1) does not affect prospecting or mining in, on or under land which, on the date of the notice is the subject of a reconnaissance permission, prospecting right, a mining right, a retention permit or a mining permit." The Minister is clearly attempting to extend the ambit of section 49(2) by attempting to apply the moratorium to section 11 applications, and renewal applications.

We can only speculate as to the rationale of the Minister, but it is difficult not to see this as an attempt to force the industry to ultimately bow to the Minister's whim in respect of Mining Charter III.
 

Written by Jonathan Veeran, Partner at Webber Wentzel