Date: 17/05/2010 Source: The World Health Organisation Title: WHO: Chan: Address by the Director-General of the World Health Organisation, at the 63rd World Health Assembly, Geneva
Mister President, honourable ministers, excellencies, distinguished delegates, Dr Mahler, ladies and gentlemen,
Public health must never cease to learn from its successes, and its failures.
Thirty years ago, the World Health Assembly declared that "the world and all its people have won freedom from smallpox". That official death certificate for an ancient scourge marked an unprecedented achievement in the history of public health. It provided dramatic proof of the power of collective action to improve the human condition in a permanent way.
This is worth remembering at a time when the international community is engaged in the most ambitious attack on human misery in history, with just five years left until 2015.
Smallpox eradication was a single-disease initiative. That killing, blinding, disfiguring disease never had a cure. The cornerstone of the campaign was prevention at a time when most health systems around the world were designed to deliver curative care.
An initiative that broke every single chain of virus transmission in every corner of the world was the ultimate example of universal coverage. This tells us what collective action for a common cause can achieve.
Among its many legacies, the eradication campaign spawned the Expanded Programme on Immunization at a time when less than 20% of children in the developing world were covered by immunization programmes.
Throughout the 1980s, the so-called "lost decade for development", the expansion of childhood immunization was a robust and inspiring success story in the midst of an oil crisis, a recession, a crushing debt crisis, and structural adjustment programmes that slashed national spending for social services, including health. This reminds us of how greatly health can suffer from polices made in other sectors.
The point I want to make is this. As we enter the second decade of the 21st century, and the homestretch for reaching the Millennium Development Goals, we need to draw on every lesson, every approach, instrument, and innovative way of raising funds or collaborating together, from heads of state to civil society. We have little time left, and little space for unproductive debates. We need to move forward fast.
We need horizontal and we need vertical approaches. We need to scale up the delivery of commodities, and we need to strengthen the fundamental capacities that allow us to do so. We need coherence in policies, within and beyond the health sector, and we need complementarity of efforts.
Reaching the health-related Goals is not about national averages. It is about reaching the poor, who are almost invariably the hardest to reach. This is the challenge, and the measure of success.
The Millennium Development Goals promote health as part of an overarching strategy for poverty reduction. To put it bluntly, if we miss the poor, we miss the point.
We have a long way to go, especially for maternal and newborn mortality, and we welcome the efforts being made, on multiple fronts, to accelerate progress in this area. But let us take heart from what has already been achieved.
Success in public health nearly always saves lives. But it also has symbolic value. Recent progress tells us that when the international community is fully committed to a goal, creative solutions can be found and obstacles, including financial ones, can be overcome.
Since the start of this century, the number of under-five childhood deaths dropped below the 10 million mark for the first time in nearly six decades, and then dropped again to below 9 million.
The number of people in low- and middle-income countries receiving antiretroviral therapy for AIDS moved from under 200,000 in late 2002, to 3 million, then beyond 4 million, an achievement unthinkable a decade ago.
The rate of people newly ill with tuberculosis peaked and then began a slow but steady decline. For the first time in decades, we are seeing signs that the steadily deteriorating malaria situation might be turned around.
Progress in controlling the neglected tropical diseases continued to make impressive strides. By the end of 2008, some 670 million people had been reached with preventive chemotherapy for at least one of these diseases. Cases of guinea worm disease are at their lowest level ever, now confined to only four countries.
I think we can conclude: increased investment for health development is working.
Like the smallpox eradication campaign, the drive to reach the Millennium Development Goals has already left some legacies that benefit public health across the board. Let me mention a few.
First, the Millennium Declaration and its Goals turned thinking about development upside down. For a long time, factors such as access to safe water and sanitation, literacy rates, infant and young child mortality, and maternal mortality were regarded as indicators of a country's level of socioeconomic development.
According to the logic at that time, living conditions and health status would gradually improve as economies developed and prosperity increased. That happened, of course, but frequently not to the benefit of society's poorest and most marginalized people. All too often, economic growth has meant wealth creation for some, and increased poverty for others.
The Goals turned this thinking around. Instead of waiting for living conditions and health status to gradually improve, the Goals called for a direct attack on the conditions and diseases that anchor people in poverty. This was put forward as the best, and probably the fastest, route to equitable and more balanced progress.
Indicators of development became engines for development. A quest for economic development became a quest for social development. The report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health has taken this thinking many steps forward.
Second, the Goals changed thinking about aid effectiveness, as reflected in the Paris Declaration and the Accra Agenda for Action. An almost fashionable scepticism about the value of aid, with blame placed on weak capacities and governance in recipient countries, was replaced by recognition that the policies and behaviours of donors could also be at fault. Accountability for results must be mutual.
Good aid honours the priorities, capacities and responsibilities of recipient governments to their citizens. Good aid aims to eliminate the very need for aid. It does so by investing in the capacities and the infrastructures needed to move towards self-reliance.
If aid does not explicitly aim for self-reliance, the need for aid will never end. For obvious reasons, breaking the cycle of dependence on aid contributes to equity among nations in a fundamental way.
Third, the drive to reach the health-related Goals unleashed the best of human creativity, bringing a host of innovations for improving health, especially among the poorest.
The list is long: the GAVI Alliance, the Global Fund, UNITAID, new partnerships to develop medicines and vaccines for diseases of the poor, advance market commitments as an incentive for industry, a finance facility for immunization, a facility to reduce the costs of malaria drugs, and the International Health Partnership as a new way of working within countries. We have all contributed in some way to these innovations for international health cooperation.
The trend continues. Earlier this year, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation launched the Decade of Vaccines by pledging $10 billion over the next ten years to help deliver existing vaccines and develop new ones.
This commitment is most welcome. Vaccines are one of the best life-saving buys on offer, preventing an estimated 2 to 3 million deaths each year. WHO and UNICEF, in close collaboration with the Gates Foundation, countries, and partners, are initiating a process to define the ambitions and scope of this Decade of Vaccines.
The momentum that has been growing since the start of this century must continue. Last month, WHO launched simultaneous immunization weeks in more than 100 countries. These events are building public and professional awareness of the value of immunization as well as saving lives.
You will be well aware of the setbacks that occur when people decide that vaccines are risky, unnecessary, or even part of a conspiracy. This has been a problem for measles, for the uptake of pandemic vaccines, and most especially for polio.
Vaccines touch your agenda at several points. You will be considering accelerated action to reduce deaths from pneumonia, the feasibility of measles eradication, and the prevention of hepatitis B virus infection through immunization of infants.
As requested by the 61st Health Assembly, you will also be considering an aggressive new strategic plan to complete polio eradication. The plan incorporates several new strategies that respond to different transmission dynamics in different settings, make use of a new bivalent vaccine, and address head-on the problem of international spread
|