URL: http://www.engineeringnews.co.za
Policy, Law, Economics and Politics - Deepening Democracy through Access to Information This privately-owned website is operated and maintained by Creamer Media
   
Polity
Article by: Reuters
Published: 06 Jun 2008
Rows threaten world food summit success
A U.N. global food crisis summit risked embarrassing failure to reach any formal agreement on combating hunger threatening a billion people worldwide. Delegates from 183 countries at the Rome talks were supposed to issue a resounding declaration on Thursday on "eliminating hunger and securing food for all".

But squabbling about trade barriers and geopolitics raised the prospect of the statement being scrapped, though diplomats did manage to circumvent a heated debate about biofuels which had put the United States and Brazil on the defensive.

"There are difficult negotiations going on," said Matthew Wyatt, deputy head of the United Nations' International Fund for Agricultural Development.

The meeting was called by the United Nations' Food and Agriculture Organisation to seek ways to secure food supplies in the face of rising demand, especially from rapidly developing Asian countries, poor harvests and rising fuel costs.

Those factors have contributed to a doubling of commodity prices over the last couple of years which the World Bank says has put 100 million people at risk of joining the 850 million already going hungry.

The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development sees prices of rice, corn and wheat retreating from peaks but still up to 50 percent higher in the next decade. The FAO says food production must rise 50 percent by 2050 to meet demand.

Despite repeated urgings at the summit to stop talking about hunger and take action, it was the wording of the final document that threatened to undermine the talks' success.

Swedish delegate Tomas Dahlman said most countries disagreed with trade barriers such as export curbs and duties, like those that grain and beef exporter Argentina uses to protect consumers against food inflation -- sparking strikes by powerful farmers.

"Most countries in the world think these are the wrong measures, that's why this language is being proposed in the declaration," he said, adding that Russia also defended timber export tariffs. "Argentina, Russia, they're the most vocal."

U.S. Agriculture Secretary Ed Schafer said countries should understand that such trade restrictions "actually exacerbate" the problem of food price inflation.

"We understand that countries want to protect their food supply and make sure that there's enough food for their own citizens but when there's a lock-out from the marketplace ... prices actually go up," Schafer told reporters in Rome.

Latin American delegates said allies of communist Cuba want to insert language Washington sees as critical of its embargo.

Delegates were seeking last-minute agreement on the text ahead of a closing news conference delayed until 1630 GMT.

BRUTAL PRICE RISE

Ghana's President John Kufuor said that, given the urgency of the food crisis, "it would be disastrous for the survival of mankind if the conclusions reached suffer the same fate" as earlier fruitless international summits.

The point of the summit, which began with speeches by 44 leaders, was questioned by Senegal's President Abdoulaye Wade, a sceptic of international hunger relief and critic of the FAO.

"There's been a brutal rise in prices (of food) and we were told there was a threat hanging over the world and all the heads of state were called to attend," Wade told Reuters.

"I thought it was going to be to answer the question about what should be done, but it wasn't that at all. It was just a conference like any other and that's why I was disappointed."

Others believed the summit had fulfilled its role already by focusing world attention on the hungry and on poor farmers.

"This is at the top of the global agenda and it's none too soon," said Josette Sheeran, head of the World Food Programme which delivers emergency supplies. "Hunger is on the march."

Although the summit was not meant to produce promises of aid or set new global policies, it has put hunger on the agenda of July's Group of Eight summit in Japan. By then U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon is due to have issued an action plan.

The Rome debate on the potential benefits to poor farmers of new global trade rules will also feed into a push to conclude the so-called Doha round of World Trade Organisation talks, which reach a potentially conclusive phase in the coming weeks.

Biofuels were the most contentious issue at the summit, with the United States and Brazil defending their use of maize and sugarcane respectively. Washington acknowledges this contributes to food inflation, but says the impact is marginal.

The final declaration was likely to appease both sides with talk of the "challenges and opportunities" of biofuels, which U.S. agriculture official Schafer called "acceptable".