Date: 05/02/2003
Source: Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism
Title: Moosa: UNEP Governing Council
STATEMENT BY MINISTER MOHAMMED VALLI MOOSA - 22ND SESSION OF THE
UNEP GOVERNING COUNCIL, 5 February 2003
HE President Wade, President of the Republic of Senegal,
HE Hon Michael Wamalwa Kijana, Vice -President of Kenya,
HE Dr Rugunda, President of the UNEP Governing Council,
Dr Klaus Topfer, Executive Director of UNEP,
Mr Nitin Desai, Under Secretary General for Economic and Social
Affairs,
Ms Anna Tibaijuka, Executive Director of UN Habitat,
Delegates, Ladies and Gentlemen
It is a wonderful opportunity for me to address this forum of
environment ministers - the first after the WSSD held in
Johannesburg.
At the outset, I would like to express my deep gratitude to UNEP
and to its Governing Council; and to my colleagues, the Ministers
of Environment, for the support South Africa received in the
build-up to and during the hosting of the WSSD. We are also
grateful to the various NGOs, and indeed all the major groups, for
the influential roles they played during the Johannesburg Summit. I
also thank those countries that provided South Africa with material
support. This assistance made a significant contribution to the
success of the Summit.
I remember our meeting here two years ago where we began to explore
what the WSSD should be about. When we look back now to what we
said then it is clear that the WSSD outcomes are close to the
parameters we had set out. The UNEP Governing Council therefore
played an important role in shaping the outcomes of the WSSD.
The Johannesburg Summit emerged with a number of important
outcomes. These include:
* The extremely high level of commitment to sustainable development
globally. We as the international community now have a higher level
of awareness of the need for sustainable development at all
levels.
* We now have an action oriented Johannesburg Plan of
Implementation, with the main focus on the WEHAB areas, and
including 37 very specific targets and timeframes.
* Johannesburg established a clear link between sustainable
development and poverty. This meant that the WSSD process and
outcomes gained the support of developing countries and other
representatives of the world's poor.
* Clear and inextricable links between the three pillars of
sustainable development were established. The practical meaning of
these links unfolded in Johannesburg. Notably, the Johannesburg
Summit served as an important point of integration. We had all the
global institutions involved in implementation represented at the
highest level.
* The Johannesburg Summit committed the international community to
implement sustainable development also through regional frameworks
and initiatives.
* The Summit accepted the concept of voluntary partnerships for
sustainable development among the various government and
non-government stakeholders. We have been speaking about this
concept for many years, but it was given practical meaning in
Johannesburg. A large number of concrete partnerships were
announced at the Summit.
The 11th Session of the Commission on Sustainable Development,
which will take place during April and May this year, would serve
as a very important platform to develop a programme of work to
ensure action for the realisation of the Johannesburg Plan of
Implementation.
This will be the first session of the CSD after Johannesburg. It
has to set out a clear vision for the next ten years. It is
important that the work of the CSD will not just be "business as
usual." We have had the WSSD, with its plan of implementation, with
dozens of clear targets and timeframes to achieve. The new
multi-year work programme should take the CSD into a completely new
phase, with new challenge to be addressed in a new framework.
Some of the issues highlighted by Mr Desai will have to be examined
further. The process of IEG reform is important. It is important to
have a strong, well-supported, and well-resourced UNEP. This would
have to be an important call we should make from CSD11.
The CSD would have to integrate the work being done on various
fronts to implement sustainable development, as was done in
Johannesburg. The CSD is not an umbrella body. It should, however,
serve as a platform for dialogue and integrative discussion among
the various institutions that have a stake in the implementation of
sustainable development at all levels.
We would also want to look at the partnerships for sustainable
development that have been announced thus far, to see that
participating countries and institution fulfil their commitments.
CSD should track what is being done to achieve
implementation.
CSD11 would be an important occasion for all governments and other
stakeholders. It should give sufficient attention to the work
programme and actions for the next ten years. Relevant ministers
should thus make time to attend CSD11 and subsequent sessions.
These are deeply political matters, and unless we attend the CSD
sessions ourselves, proper implementation will not be
achieved.
I will be having discussions with Mr Desai and others over the next
few days, to discuss and start to set out a meaningful work
programme for the CSD. We hope that you would interact with us over
the next few days, to make sure we achieve this together.
There is a significant build up of events, including The CBD
meeting on benefit-sharing of biodiversity resources, and the World
Water Forum.
Lastly, I would like to pick up on a comment by the Vice-President
of Kenya. There is presently a tremendous level of insecurity in
the world. We must all condemn those who commit terrorism in the
name of the poor; they are acting as agent's provocateurs. We must
also say that war is bad for the environment and for sustainable
development. All those who stand for advancing the cause of
sustainable development and of the poor should call for peace,
especially when the world is going in the disastrous direction of
war.
I thank you.
Source: Department of Foreign Affairs
(http://www.environment.gov.za)
|