Chapter 7
Unemployment Insurance & Public
Works Programmes
- This chapter explores two major labour market programmes designed
to support unemployed people. These are the Unemployment Insurance
Fund (UIF) and the Public Works Programme. The Commission makes
specific recommendations as to how both programmes could be made
more effective. We begin by pointing out the extent to which
the unemployed currently rely upon other household members and
upon informal sector activities.
- The UIF is a contributory social insurance fund designed to
deal with frictional unemployment. As such it has little impact
on the most serious aspect of unemployment long-term unemployment.
Many of the unemployed have been without work for several years
and have become discouraged from searching further. Other workers,
above a certain age, who lose their jobs find employers unwilling
to hire them. And young workers find it difficult to get employment,
especially first-time employment. The UIF does not deal with
the central aspect of the unemployment problem, nor should it
try to do so. Public works programmes, dealt with later in this
chapter, are only a partial solution to the problem.
- There is therefore a need to investigate whether a general
income transfer to the unemployed is sustainable and affordable
in South Africa. The Commission spent some time examining the
concept of a basic income grant in South Africa. We looked at
the advantages and disadvantages of making a modest monthly transfer
from the fiscus to all citizens. The social and labour-market
advantages could clearly be substantial. It would, for example,
increase household income in poor households and could moderate
wage pressure and enhance labour mobility. But the potential
difficulties, not least the expense, which a programme of this
nature would involve, are daunting. However, there may be advantage
in considering the gradual introduction of such a scheme, beginning
with younger workers, and integrating it with other social transfers
and the ongoing process of welfare reforms. The magnitude of
the basic income issue (or similar scheme), and the fact that
our terms of reference did not specifically direct us to it, led
the Commission to put the matter to one side.
- However there is no doubt that unemployment is a major problem
requiring major solutions. All the economic policies and proposals
from government, employers, unions and international institutions
stress, correctly, the need to create jobs. All, even on their
most optimistic assumptions, expect unemployment levels to remain
extreme for years to come. The Commission recommends that the
Department of Labour, in conjunction with the Department of Social
Welfare and the Department of Finance, assess the possibility
of a new and substantial scheme aimed at alleviating the poverty
associated with unemployment. This should include an investigation
of the basic income notion (in both general and incremental form)
as well as more traditional "dole" systems.
Household Support for the Unemployed
- Income support for unemployed people in South Africa is limited
and sparse. Those who contributed to the UIF when employed are
able to draw benefits for up to 26 weeks. Those who have never
been employed, or were never contributors to the UIF, are forced
to rely on other sources of income support. These include working
in the so-called "informal sector" and relying on the
generosity of employed relatives or those receiving state transfers
such as pensions.
- According to the SALDRU survey of October 1993, 53% of unemployed
people live in households with no wage-income earners. This indicates
the importance of state transfers and informal activities in supporting
unemployed people. While wage income is clearly also an important
source of support for the unemployed living in households with
one or more wage earner, it is far from sufficient, as 54% of
such households live below the poverty line. This figure rises
to 76% in rural areas.
- Income transfers (pensions, disability grants, etc.) are also
an important source of income support. However, according to
the SALDRU data, 63% of the unemployed live in households with
no recipients of an income transfer. Furthermore, of those who
live in households with such recipients, a mere 21% are above
the poverty line. This falls to 15% in rural areas. While it
cannot be doubted that the old age pensions system and other associated
welfare provisions have second-round welfare effects upon other
household members, it is just as clear that such programmes cannot
adequately support the entire pool of the unemployed.
- Thus, it is debatable whether state transfers, wage income
or income generated from informal activity by other household
members should be regarded as a "social safety net"
of some kind. Such household income certainly provides a measure
of support for unemployed household members, but one can conclude
very little about the dynamics of redistribution within households.
While employment creation must form the heart of any strategy
designed to alleviate poverty, higher wages and more generous
transfer payments insofar as these are feasible
would also reduce poverty, provided higher wages do not lead to
a counter-productive decrease in employment.
Unemployment Insurance
- The Unemployment Insurance Fund (UIF) is designed to deal
with frictional or short-term unemployment. It does not provide
income security for the long-term unemployed, or for the many
unemployed non-contributors. The ILO Review cites estimates that
less than 12% of the unemployed are supported by UIF benefits.
Nevertheless, the system does provide some income security to
those contributors at risk of short-term unemployment.
- Eligible workers and their employers currently each pay one
percent of the wage to the UIF. Benefits (set at a replacement
rate of 45% of the last wage received) are paid to unemployed
contributors. One week's benefit is paid for every 6 weeks worked
up to a maximum of 26 weeks' benefit. As indicated in the ILO
Review, the replacement rate and the maximum period of benefit
payments are low by international standards. Given the minimal
support provided by the UIF, it is most unlikely that the receipt
of UIF benefits discourages job search on the part of unemployed
beneficiaries in South Africa.
- Although coverage has improved in recent years, the selective
and arbitrary character of the UIF system has persisted. Workers
still excluded from contributing to or receiving benefits from
the UIF include those earning above R69 420, contract workers,
piece workers, casual workers working less than eight hours a
week, domestic workers and employees in central government. The
Commission recommends that consideration be given to extending
UIF eligibility to the entire workforce. This however would require
a restructuring of the UIF, in particular a move towards individual-based
record keeping, as suggested below.
- Unemployment insurance in South Africa has had a chequered
history, with coverage and benefit entitlements altering in line
with racial policies and changing perceptions of the role of the
UIF (see the ILO Review). Very low paid workers were excluded
from the system, and officials of the Department of Labour were
entitled to deny benefits to unemployed contributors if they failed
to take up what officials deemed to be "suitable" employment.
This was particularly harsh for lower income groups. In this
way, workfare-type provisions allowed for the manipulation of
the number, class and racial composition of beneficiaries.
- Revisions to the UIF system from the late 1970s onwards both
extended coverage (notably to lower paid workers, gold and coal
miners, and most recently, to agricultural workers) and moved
away from workfare. According to UIF statistics, approximately
6.3 million workers are now contributing. These figures, however,
are suspect because official statistics suggest that only 5 million
workers are eligible. While it is likely that employment is underestimated
by official statistics (see the ILO Review on this issue), this
probably does not account for the discrepancy. The problem appears
to lie primarily in the way in which the UIF operates and generates
statistics.
- At present, employers deduct one percent from the wages of
all eligible workers and supplement the total with an equivalent
amount. The total is then paid over to the UIF as a lump sum.
The UIF has no reliable record of either the number of contributors,
or of the amount each individual has paid into the Fund. When
a contributor becomes unemployed, he or she has to take their
record card (kept by the employer) to the Department of Labour
in order to show how long they have been contributing to the UIF.
This system is inadequate and open to abuse. It contributes
to the serious allegations of fraud which must be addressed urgently.
- The Commission recommends a thorough overhaul of the UIF system.
The UIF should keep individual records of paid-in contributions
by employees. Employers should be required to state the name
of each contributor, the wage, and the amount of the contribution
to the UIF. By giving workers access to their individual records,
checks can be made on employers suspected of paying in too little
to the UIF. Improving such voice regulation ought to improve
the financial position of the UIF.
- As stated above, the Commission supports the widening of UIF
coverage to as many workers as possible. The experience internationally
is that most UI schemes do not cover workers in sectors that employ
seasonal workers or where coverage would be very difficult or
very costly to administer. However, the Commission is of the
opinion that through revising the way in which the UIF is administered
greater coverage will become possible. In this spirit, the Commission
recommends that consideration be given to making the UIF available
to domestic workers and their employers as part of an attempt
to formalise employment relationships and increase security for
the more than 874 000 regular and casual employees in this sector.
- As regards workers in short-term employment (and in Public
Works Programmes), it is important to note that workers need to
contribute to the UIF for 3 years if they are to draw the full
26 weeks benefit. In other words, the level of contributions
of workers in short-term employment is unlikely to be significant
enough to warrant inclusion in the UIF system. Nevertheless,
there is no intrinsic reason why such workers should not be eligible
to become contributors to the UIF.
- Apart from unemployment benefits (which account for 80% of
total benefits paid), the UIF provides benefits to the dependants
of deceased contributors, as well as illness, maternity and adoption
benefits to contributors (all payable up to 26 weeks). The Commission
recommends that these benefits be retained.
- There is a view that the receipt of unemployment benefits
should be made conditional on beneficiaries taking part in training
programmes, or being obliged to be available to take specific
jobs or places on public works programmes. The Commission rejects
the movement towards workfare implicit in such proposals. The
abuse of such workfare provisions by Department of Labour officials
in the past points to the dangers of arbitrary and ill-informed
direction and ad hoc denial of benefits. The UIF is a
system of short-term income compensation for being unemployed
not an instrument for training and job allocation
and should remain as such.
- The Commission strongly supports the provision of labour market
information to UIF beneficiaries. Informing beneficiaries about
possible jobs and relevant training programmes should be an important
function of the Department of Labour. However, under no circumstances
should beneficiaries be denied benefits if they refuse to undertake
training or accept jobs selected for them by the Department of
Labour. They should be encouraged to register with the placement
services of the Department, but should not be required to do so.
- The finances of the UIF have been in a dismal state for many
years. Contributions by workers and employers were reduced in
the 1950s and from then onwards the UIF suffered chronic deficits
which were mostly covered by a government contribution of 25%.
In 1977, a ceiling of R7 million a year was placed on the state's
contribution. This contribution, which declined in real terms
and is now low by international standards, squeezed the Fund to
such an extent that, despite the rise in contributions by workers
and employers from 0,5% of the wage bill in 1984 to one percent
in 1993, the government had to bail out the fund in an ad hoc
manner on numerous occasions. For instance, the 1995/6 budget
allocated R268 million to the UIF as additional support.
- The reasons for the UIF's poor financial state are many and
complex and have been the subject of the Auditor General's Report.
Possible fraud has already been mentioned. Aside from this,
it appears that the major reason for the financial deterioration
between the mid 1960s to the mid 1970s was the admission of large
numbers of low-paid workers to the Fund. However, real contributions
have recovered over the past ten years and now the problem appears
to be related to the increase in the number of benefit recipients
per 100 contributors (see the ILO Review).
- In short, the UIF has expanded in a non-viable way. It has
a growing number of low income contributors with a high risk of
unemployment, while the relative number of those with a low risk
of unemployment has dwindled, and those earning high incomes (with
the lowest probability of unemployment and lowest income insecurity)
are excluded altogether.
- This situation is undesirable and unsustainable. The Commission
recommends that urgent attention be given to restructuring the
UIF. In particular, the Commission recommends that the exclusion
from UIF of those earning over R69 420 be removed as soon as possible.
By increasing the number of high-paid contributors (with lower
risks of becoming unemployed) the UIF will become more solvent
and will facilitate a greater degree of redistribution. Consideration
should also be given to providing a minimum benefit to low paid
workers and a maximum benefit to very high-paid employees.
- Other ways of improving the viability of the UIF include investigating
allegations of fraud in pay-out points and reorganising personnel
requirements in such a manner that they reduce overstaffing at
the Regional Centres and Labour Centres while increasing the complement
of inspectors. A further measure is one already initiated by
the Fund. This involved gaining the co-operation of the Compensation
Commissioner in tracing defaulting contributors in the Pretoria
area. This pooling of resources generated a net income of approximately
R1.5 million. This is a clear justification for the state pursuing
this strategy in the rest of the country. The Commission also
heard arguments that automatic teller machines could be used to
dispense UIF benefits in a cost effective and convenient fashion.
- In the longer term, there may be a case for linking all the
institutions associated with the provision of benefits into one
information-gathering data base. In this manner, it will be possible
for UIF evaders be traced through their contribution to other
employee benefits. For example, if an employer were a pension
contributor, but not an UI contributor, a data base of this sort
would very easily uncover this form of non-payment. The Commission
believes it would be desirable if all statutory workplace deductions
such as UIF, Workers' Compensation and council levies
were listed on one form and effected with one transfer. A one-stop
system of this sort would improve monitoring, be administratively
simpler for employers, and encourage compliance.
- A further set of recommendations relates to the declaration
of income tax returns. Current legislation prevents any individual
or institution, private or public, from gaining access to this
information. This raises the possibility that unscrupulous employers
might be overstating their wage bill where applicable tax deductions
exist, and understating this bill in reporting to the UIF. Access
to the income tax returns of all registered businesses could simultaneously
enable the UIF to detect such under-reporting and the Department
of Revenue to uncover those who over-declare for tax purposes.
However, this measure may be unnecessary once the UIF system
is revised to create individual records of contributors as suggested
earlier.
- Litigation procedures currently impose scant fines on firms
who fail to make their Unemployment Insurance contributions.
In addition the costs on the Fund of taking an employer to court
are unduly high. Given the fact that these legal procedures are
intended to benefit the destitute and the needy, it is the Commission's
recommendation that the costs and penalties associated with non-payment
of Unemployment Insurance should be reconsidered, with a view
to making the Fund's role in provision of adequate benefits easier.
- The final recommendation regards the investment of the UIF's
contributions. Currently, according to the Unemployment Insurance
Act, funds may only be invested through the Public Investment
Corporation. It is the Commission's view that consideration be
given to allowing some of the UIF's financial assets to be invested
in the open market by private sector fund managers. This raises
the likelihood of greater returns for the Fund.
Public Works Programmes
- Over the decade prior to the 1994 elections there were a number
of public employment programmes in South Africa. The Special
Employment Creation Programmes (SECP) ran between 1983 and 1992,
and spent approximately R1 billion while creating an estimated
114 million person-days of work during this time. This equates
to roughly R2 200 per full time equivalent employee (although
these figures are not in constant-valued rand). The Strategic
Oil Funds (SOF) projects spent a billion rand between 1990 and
1993 on employment creation projects that created 60 346 jobs.
More recently, the former National Economic Forum (NEF) was requested
by the government to design and execute a job creation programme.
By 30 June 1995, a total of 561 projects with a value of R229
million had been approved. This history also represents something
of a learning curve. Assessments of early programmes revealed
them to be poorly organised, short-lived, uncoordinated and too
narrowly focused on instantaneous job creation. By 1993, the
NEF programme sought to set itself up as a model public works
programme which would aim to create short-term employment, enhance
skills acquisition and training and produce quality infrastructure
with the capacity to release further private sector investment
and build community capacity to participate in development.
- The current initiative to assist the unemployed has two components.
The first is the National Public Works Programme (NPWP) which
is an enabling framework that regulates the terms under which
public contracts are granted, including the question of wage rates.
It does not actually fund any employment programmes, but it is
the mechanism through which the numbers employed via public sector
contracts can be increased. The second component is the Community
Based Public Works Programme (CBPWP), launched as a Presidential
Lead Project within the National Public Works Programme (NPWP).
A grant of R250 million was allocated from the RDP Fund to finance
the CBPWP through the end of the 1996 fiscal year. All projects
have been scheduled to finish within this time period, and as
yet there is no guarantee of funding beyond this period. Well
over half of this funding has been allocated to provincial governments
with the poorer provinces being specifically targeted. The remaining
funds have been allocated variously to the Independent Development
Trust (IDT), the National Sugar Association, and other non-governmental
organisations (NGOs).
- Provincial projects have required a considerable degree of
prior community and provincial capacity building. Despite employment
targets of 30 000 jobs during 1995/6 and 68 000 during 1996/7,
these provincial programmes have taken a long time to get going
and most projects have only recently started. As a consequence
there is no monitoring and evaluation information yet available.
This lagging of a Presidential Lead Project is widely seen to
be a problem. It would seem that the IDT, an NGO with a vast
experience of working with communities, has been more successful.
Using the same procedure as the provinces in terms of costing
and implementing projects, the IDT had allocated its full budget
by January of 1996. A recent analysis of these projects estimates
that they have created 28 158 jobs which, using published dependency
rates, could be said to have a broader impact on some 108 000
people. If it is assumed that all prongs of the CBPWP will eventually
produce the same results, an upper-bound estimate of the employment
creation resulting from the CBPWP would be 100 564 jobs.
- There remain numerous problems and obstacles in assuring the
effectiveness of the CBPWP in creating productive employment.
Firstly the Commission is concerned about evidence that the programmes
instituted are not giving sufficient attention to the need for
skills upgrading and training. The latter is vital if the CBPWP
is to serve as a springboard for more sustainable employment in
the long run. Second, explicit recognition needs to be given
to the fact that such short-term employment must lead to the development
of needed infrastructure. This, however, is only viable if opportunities
beyond the initial project are addressed in advance with
a focus on assistance regarding possible career pathing informed
by industry and development plans. An excellent example was developed
in the electrical working field, where electrification job creation
schemes funded through the RDP were augmented by follow-up training
and structured work experience with house wiring and appliance
installation, leading ultimately, after a training programme,
to a self-sustaining skill in appliance repair accredited by the
relevant training board. Other sectoral training boards need
to be challenged to develop similar learning pathways which can
be "grown" after the completion of job creation schemes,
and the necessary funding is put in place.
- A crucial facet of any public works programme is the method
of remuneration. The CBPWP has opted for a task-based wage on
their various projects. International evidence from Kenya's Rural
Access Road Programme, for example, reveals that this form of
payment together with the piece-work wage has been very effective.
However, the task-based payment systems, although promising positive
productivity gains, are open to abuse by employers or project
managers. Managers may constantly re-evaluate what is to be considered
a gain in productivity. In addition, these remunerative packages
will, in their initial stages at least, require intensive supervision
to minimise dishonesty. Furthermore, unions believe that workers
may "exploit themselves", wanting to complete more tasks
per day in order to increase their wage. It is vital that proponents
of the CBPWP be mindful of these drawbacks, and institute the
necessary checks and balances in order to prevent abuse of the
task-based wage.
- Intricately linked to the issue of remuneration is that of
targeting the most needy in the CBPWP. The wage in these projects
is determined through negotiation between the project leader and
the community's project committee, and is written into the contract.
Data on average wages paid on CBPWP projects is not available,
but by all accounts average wages are quite low. Submissions
to the Commission suggested that these range from R7 to R10 per
day, climbing to about R25 per day. As many have pointed out,
this has the advantage of both spreading limited funds more widely
and of acting as a screening device: only the most needy will
be willing to work for such wages. There remain problems though
in the CBPWP's targeting mechanism. For example, very few women
and youth have been working on the projects that have been launched.
This is particularly true of the projects in Kwazulu/Natal.
Targeting of the most needy is notoriously difficult, if only
because these groups are very often difficult to reach given poor
channels of communication and inadequate access to labour market
information flows.
- The notion within the CBPWP that its operation should be decentralised
is supported by the Commission. However, the partial decentralisation
of activities to the provincial level has yielded problems. The
poor records of provincial governments in allocating their CBPWP
funds are grounds for concern. Local authority elections have
now made it possible, if further funding is forthcoming, to ensure
that legitimate local-level institutions enact and oversee the
CBPWP. A flattened hierarchy of this sort would generate greater
community participation which, in turn, would seem to be the only
way of ensuring that public works initiatives are assimilated
into community development plans.
- The CBPWP lacks formal, built-in evaluation and monitoring
mechanisms. It is crucial that such procedures are integral to
any programme from the earliest proposals through to ongoing monitoring
of the project during its life and concluding with post-project
evaluation. Such evaluations serve as invaluable early warning
systems and also aid in decisions about future short-term job
creation schemes that the state may want to undertake.
- The current funding to the CBPWP, through tranches from the
RDP Fund, is temporary and is subject to a review process. The
temporary nature of the funding hinders appropriate planning for
existing programmes and new projects under the auspices of the
CBPWP. This instability has also contributed to poor performance
and high turnover rates amongst staff members. In an oral submission
to the Commission, officials of the CBPWP have argued that the
insecurity of funding has not allowed them to learn from past
mistakes to ensure that, with the second round of funding, these
errors may be avoided and the programme implemented more effectively.
- The Commission supports the provision of further financial
support to the CBPWP at current modest levels and recommends that
the CBPWP be directly funded as a line item in the budget of the
Department of Public Works for a four-year period. In this way
continuity in funding can occur and will be symbolic of a medium-term,
but conditional, commitment to the CBPWP. This will also allow
the CBPWP to offer the NGOs more stable funding which will in
turn enable them to commit resources to managing and implementing
employment programmes. This is essential if the programme is
to have a significant impact on employment.
- A full assessment of the programme should be undertaken at
the end of each year of the four-year funding period. If the
programmes can be shown to be performing efficiently, consideration
should be given to increasing the level of funding before the
end of the four year period.
- Given the severity of South Africa's unemployment problem,
the Commission would have wished to support a stronger recommendation
that the scale of the CBPWP be increased significantly. However,
the Commission cannot recommend an increased commitment to the
CBPWP until credible monitoring and evaluation information from
the CBPWP convincingly shows that the CBPWP is creating jobs and
skills by delivering infrastructure through processes that are
both community-driven and cost-effective. There are a number
of difficult trade-offs between these goals and between equity
objectives and efficiency objectives. The medium-term assessment
will look for clear evidence that an appropriate balance has been
struck. The Commission's support for stable funding at the current
level allows the CBPWP to make its own case. To the extent that
it is becomes a valued participant in community development initiatives,
the CBPWP will also be in a position to leverage its own additional
funding through partnerships with the private sector for local
infrastructural development.
- International evidence has shown that well-managed public
works programmes can indeed create significant amounts of employment
for the poorest members of society, at extremely low cost, and
in so doing generate productive infrastructure and prevent environmental
deterioration. An example of a particularly successful rural
programme, which has been running since 1979, is the Employment
Guarantee Scheme of the Maharashtra state government of India.
This scheme has employed an average of half a million people
at any given time from 1975 to 1989, with as much as 79% of project
expenses being devoted to wages, not overheads, and with 90% of
recipients being below the poverty line. The scheme has improved
water supplies, built roads, planted trees for environmental reclamation
and improved soil conservation.
The National Public Works Programme
- As part of the RDP, there has been consistent discussion of
the need to reorient the way that government ministries perform
their tasks. A major part of this reorientation concerns a commitment
to employment creation without compromising on quality of service
or speed of delivery. However, restructuring is difficult especially
in the context of severe budget cuts and delivery pressures.
Thus, the focus on employment creation within government is not
generalised but is predominantly concentrated on construction
activities within the line ministries. The construction sector
is viewed by many as an important engine of any employment-creation
strategy, and the Commission endorses this emphasis. However,
a shift in construction techniques in the direction of greater
labour intensity will not be possible without a significant restructuring
of the industry. With this in mind, we turn our attention to
the National Public Works Programme (NPWP).
- The NPWP is medium- to long-term in nature. The aim here
is, broadly, to encourage and advocate, through the Department
of Public Works, the use of labour-intensive methods of production
in the provision of infrastructure by the public sector, and by
those tendering for public sector contracts. Ancillary goals
of the NPWP include the acquisition of skills on the job, intensive
community participation, the creation of necessary assets and
finally the promotion of involvement of small-scale black contractors
in the provision of infrastructure. Given the nature of the NPWP,
its focus is essentially sectoral. More specifically the programme
intends to use the leverage that the government has with the private
sector to intervene in various ways in the construction industry
and also to intervene in the construction activities of all line
ministries.
- Recent trends in construction include a move toward more flexible
methods of production, particularly that of labour-only subcontracting
(LOSC) which enables firms to avoid the costs of providing benefits
and other regulations. The movement to LOSC has generated a series
of problems such as a decline in training. Although the increase
in LOSC has shifted employment towards SMMEs, the majority of
which are black-owned, it comes at the expense of training, health
and safety and minimum-wage protections. Recent pressure from
the industry on the Department of Labour to pay for the training
of subcontracted employees is effectively a request to transfer
responsibility for training investment from the private to the
public purse. The Commission debated the proposition that the
private sector should be required to contribute towards skilling
the subcontractors they engage. Some were concerned that this
may halt the work to sub-contractors, while others feared that
if no such contribution is required, the informalisation of the
labour market may be accelerated. The Commission resolved to
support the proposal in respect of all publicly funded contracts
and to recommend an investigation in respect of private contracts.
- Construction, as is well known, is a feast or famine industry
that experiences regular booms and downward cycles, with large
fluctuations in the level of employment. Faced with an industry
of this character, the Department of Public Works is attempting
to put in place what it terms an "enabling environment".
This environment involves a set of inter-related policies, including
the proper planning of public sector infrastructure projects,
to ensure that the construction industry has a more predictable
demand for its services over a long period, the encouragement
of the use of black-owned small, medium and microenterprises in
the allocation of contracts, and the facilitation of closer working
relationships between big construction companies, construction
workers, SMMEs and more casual work seekers in this sector.
- It is clear that such a strategy hinges on the participation
of the suppliers of the product, particularly those few who dominate
the industry. Without the guarantee of a steady demand for infrastructure,
such firms are unlikely to be persuaded by a strategy that serves
to alter the manner in which business has been done for scores
of years.
- The second crucial segment of the Department's advocacy strategy,
is to serve as the co-ordinating ministry for all infrastructural
provision undertaken by the various other ministries. Currently,
departments such as Water Affairs and Forestry, Transport, and
Health are involved in infrastructure projects, the majority of
which do not involve the Department of Public Works. The attempt
of the latter then, is to begin a process of drawing in all the
relevant ministries into its strategy. This would ensure the
reorientation of public sector investment and, as a corollary,
assist in the transformation of the construction industry.
- An important aspect of co-ordination should be the provision
of technical support to the relevant line ministries. The major
focus of the technical support is directed at middle management
involved at the coalface of the numerous projects. A large number
of civil engineers, quantity surveyors, architects and other civil
servants in public sector construction are not adequately trained
in labour-based methods of production. The Department intends
to assist in the provision of this training to all the affected
civil servants in all the relevant departments. Operationalising
this support is crucial to infrastructural provision that views
employment creation as a key objective. Indeed international
evidence indicates that numerous projects have failed because
the pre-project groundwork was hastily overlooked.
- There is clearly some tension that needs to be resolved for
the co-ordination with line ministries to be successful. Various
ministries are, correctly, intent on delivery in a timely manner.
This objective is often seen to stand in contrast to more labour-intensive
methods of production which are assumed to be more cumbersome
and difficult to implement. A further contradiction lies in the
quality of the product and its cost. Labour-intensive production
may at times yield a poorer quality product, and may also be more
costly. Ministries, working within tight budgetary constraints
and expectant communities, are therefore likely to be sceptical
of this method of production. A view often expressed by firms
in the construction sector and even some of the ministries is
that the practical aspects of labour-intensive construction need
to be considered carefully by the Department of Public Works before
projects can be managed in this manner. However this form of
construction has been attempted elsewhere, and a wealth of experience
exists in the area. The Department must make this knowledge more
accessible. But this should be complemented by a more concerted
effort by suppliers to adopt this approach.
- Government's attempt to foster this enabling environment is
partially reflected in the recently developed Framework Agreement
for Labour-Intensive Construction. The agreement is an attempt
to reach a compromise between unions and employers regarding appropriate
wages, benefits and minimum standards for workers on large-scale
Public Works Programmes. While some agreement has been reached,
it is not clear that all issues have been resolved.
- Because they are labour-intensive, it may be necessary for
wages on these projects to be lower than those prevailing on more
capital-intensive projects. To this end the Department of Public
Works has proposed that a Labour Order be drawn up, in consultation
with the relevant parties. The Labour Order would set a floor
with guidelines. It has been agreed that wages in the NPWP would
be a certain percentage of those paid in the relevant formal sector
labour market. However, the suggestion that task-based payments
be instituted has generated resistance. As discussed above, these
task-based payment systems are compulsory on the predominantly
rural CBPWP projects. However, they are much more difficult to
implement and even to justify in established urban labour markets.
- The advocacy strategy of the Department of Public Works also
has to incorporate a sense of developing a wider system of linkages
in the provision of infrastructure. This would involve including
all relevant interest groups in the process of delivery. There
should be efficient co-operation within government and between
government, trade unions and the private sector. In this sense,
the NPWP should be viewed as a mechanism for creating social consensus
on the issue of employment generation in the construction industry.
More specifically this consensus could be achieved through the
medium of a sectoral accord. The parties to the accord would
include government, the private construction firms and the unions
representing construction workers. Sufficient representation
from smaller firms must be ensured, while government representation
would be dominated by those departments involved in the delivery
of public infrastructure. This process has already begun within
the ambit of the Framework Agreement. In an accord process, though,
government would bring to the table the promise of a steady flow
of public sector construction projects. Unions may concede greater
flexibility in the method and level of remuneration, in return
for greater and more secure employment. They could be offered
a more stable industrial relations environment where the use of
labour brokers and casual labour would be curtailed. The private
sector would, in return for a definite flow of public projects,
offer to undertake labour-intensive construction methods and take
over facilitation of industry accredited training. The Commission
therefore recommends that the reorientation of the construction
industry would be best achieved through the medium of an industrial
level accord that seeks sufficient consensus amongst the three
interested parties at a regional level, with the primary attractors
being jobs and employment security for trade unions and more stable
levels of demand for the firms involved.
Employment Subsidies
- The Commission recommends that a task force within the Department
of Labour should be convened to consider the pros and cons of
employment subsidies. Issues to be resolved include, at a minimum:
an assessment of the international evidence; better forecasts
of cost per job created as compared to other programmes; the advantages
and disadvantages of various subsidisation techniques; the optimal
(and feasible) source of financing; and the consistency of this
strategy with other economic policies.