Chapter 3
Industrial Strategy
- Key aspects of labour market performance most significantly levels
of (un)employment and labour absorptive capacity, but also skill requirements
and shortages and wage differentials are powerfully influenced by the
unusually high levels of capital intensity that characterise the South
African economy.
- The industrial strategy followed will significantly influence the composition
of investment and, hence, its labour absorptive capacity. A strategy directed
at encouraging labour absorbing investment is effectively one that seeks
to promote economic growth through measures aimed at increasing the deployment
of labour and raising the productivity of capital. Expressed otherwise,
these measures encourage the extensive utilisation of general labour and
the intensive utilisation of capital and skilled labour. This is, for obvious
reasons, a highly appropriate general strategy in a labour-surplus and
capital-constrained economy like South Africa's.
- However, the economy-wide imperative to increase the productivity of
capital should not be construed as one that tolerates, much less encourages,
inefficiency in the utilisation of labour. While in the non-traded sectors
of the economy there is a degree of leeway that would permit society to
trade off efficiency in resource use for other objectives additional
employment opportunities for example these possibilities are increasingly
constrained in the production of internationally tradable goods and services.
Here, within the parameters of a given technology choice and these choices
are, in fact, highly circumscribed all factor inputs, including labour,
have to be deployed at maximum levels of efficiency. In any event, as will
be elaborated below, increasing labour productivity is not necessarily
incompatible with the requirement for employment growth.
- This chapter is then concerned with policy interventions designed to
influence the composition of investment in the direction of greater labour
intensity, or greater capital productivity. In the language of economic
theory we are, in this chapter, concerned with the promotion of allocative
efficiency, with ensuring that investment choices express our particular
endowment of the key factors of production, best characterised as a relative
abundance of unskilled and semi-skilled labour and a relative shortage
of capital and skilled labour.
- Industrial policy is, however, concerned with more than promoting overall
allocative efficiency. It is equally concerned with enhancing the capabilities
of the various inputs into the productive process and with enhancing the
efficiency with which they are combined. These are, in the economics literature,
respectively referred to as dynamic efficiency and x-efficiency.
The policy interventions designed to secure these micro-level efficiencies,
most particularly those directly associated with the functioning of the
labour market, are detailed in Chapter 5, the chapter dealing with productivity.
We must emphasise that the overriding concern of industrial strategy is
with enhancing productivity in the first instance it is concerned with
the overall deployment of the society's productive inputs; in the second
instance it is concerned with enhancing the capabilities, the efficiencies,
of the various productive factors.
- We should emphasise that while this chapter and our discussion of productivity
in Chapter 5 both focus primarily on manufacturing, the question of productivity
enhancement is no less relevant in other areas of the economy. Furthermore,
the Commission holds that while industrial policy must be designed with
sectoral considerations in mind, the boundaries between economic sectors
are in fact not always well defined, nor do the firms in different sectors
exist in isolation from one another. Hence, industrial policy must also
be designed in recognition of the backward and forward linkages between
firms in various of the traditionally demarcated sectors, between firms
and their sub-contractors and between large and small firms in the same
industry. The success of industrial policy will depend in part on its ability
to recognise, and enhance, these inter-connections.
The Composition of Economic Activity
- A recent comparative survey found that South African manufacturing
is dominated to an unusual degree by sectors characterised by their high
capital intensities the unusually significant representation in the industrial
structure of the commodity chemicals industry, electricity generation,
and non-ferrous metals best illustrates this argument. Moreover, within
these broad sectors, South African manufacturing tends to be oriented towards
the most capital-intensive end of the spectrum of activities. A breakdown
of the chemicals sector, with its relatively high degree of commitment
to petrochemicals is illustrative of this point. The services and agricultural
sectors are also dominated by capital-intensive sub-sectors.
- The reverse side of this coin is, of course, the relatively low level
of commitment to labour-intensive sub-sectors of manufacturing, services
and agriculture those sub-sectors that generate significant levels of
employment for each unit of capital invested, and, as important, that generate
jobs whose formal skill requirements are often low relative to those demanded
by the capital-intensive sectors:
- In manufacturing, significant examples of sectoral "underinvestment"
relative, that is, to international comparators are the clothing and
footwear sectors and the furniture sector.
- South Africa is under represented, again relative to international
norms, in key segments of the services sector, inevitably those segments
where labour intensities are significant tourism is the outstanding example
here. There is also a general underdevelopment of SMMEs within most sectors,
although recent trends to outsource and subcontract have begun to reverse
this.
- Intra-sectoral investment that bears a low level of commitment to labour-intensive
production is further manifest in agriculture. Vine crops, for example,
have an employment multiplier 50% greater than other horticultural crops,
which, in turn, have an employment multiplier 50% greater than livestock,
which in turn has an employment multiplier 50% greater than field crops.
This varying degree of capital intensity in agriculture is indicative of
past policy distortions that did not always direct resources where the
profit or employment generated was the greatest.
- This unusual sectoral composition underpins the relatively high degree
of capital intensity that characterises the South African economy. The
labour market consequences of this bias towards capital-intensive industries
are dramatic. Within manufacturing, the R353 000 (in 1990 prices) required
to generate a single job in the chemical industry provides a telling contrast
with the mere R2 700 (in 1990 prices) required to generate a job in clothing.
An additional R1 million rand of final demand will create 19 jobs in wheat
compared with 153 jobs in vine crops. The burgeoning number of micro enterprises
is evidence of the low entry costs at this end of the market in many sectors,
especially in the retail sector. However the high failure rate of these
ventures renders them unreliable as income generators.
- It is more difficult to demonstrate whether, within each sector, South
African producers choose to employ relatively capital-intensive techniques.
It is not, as already noted, even clear that the range of technical choice
is as wide as economic theory assumes, particularly in the traded goods
sector. South African firms tend to be larger than those in other countries
at a similar level of development. To the extent that larger concerns tend
to greater degrees of capital intensity than smaller units, we may expect
technology choice in South African manufacturing to exhibit this bias.
Submissions to the Commission indicate that similar considerations apply
to agriculture unusually large farm sizes are conducive to capital-intensive
technology choices.
- However, the problem is easier to identify than the solutions. An extremely
complex array of factors, aside from relative factor prices, account for
the unusually capital-intensive composition of economic activity. Past
industrial strategies and policies have played a significant role in influencing
the overall structure and composition of our economy. Our natural resource
base, particularly the requirements of deep-level gold mining both in
the mining operation itself and many of the key inputs required also
stands out among the factors that underpin these features of our economy.
Over the years powerful institutions and social interests, in both the
private and public sectors, have become deeply locked into our economic
structure and will resist policy interventions that attempt to transform
it.
- Moreover, the policy interventions necessary to shift the composition
of economic activity from its historically capital-absorbing to a more
labour-absorbing path, are by no means clear-cut. It must be understood
that a simple decision to structure incentives and rewards so as to privilege
investments in labour-intensive sectors over capital-intensive sectors
will not, on its own, be sufficient to achieve the desired outcomes. As
already indicated, the divisions between sectors are sufficiently blurred
to allow for the possibility that a highly capital-intensive investment
may necessitate or, at least, render viable, ancillary investments that
are relatively labour-intensive. By the same token, achieving competitiveness
in, for example, the labour-intensive clothing sector may necessitate considerable
new investment in the relatively capital-intensive textile sector. Also,
established, average capital-labour ratios are not necessarily accurate
guides to future outcomes the next job in the petrochemicals sector will
absorb considerably less capital than the average of all those created
thus far.
- These qualifications notwithstanding, the validity of our initial observation
is unchallenged: the overall composition of economic activity in South
Africa is unusually capital-intensive. This reflects, in part, a set of
strategic choices made by the policymakers of previous governments. In
the context of trade and financial sanctions, previous strategic choices
emphasised national self-sufficiency in key products and access to secure
foreign exchange sources. The upshot of these strategic decisions was an
industrial strategy that effectively rewarded investment in highly capital-intensive
sectors and processes. The imperatives of the present government dictate
a different set of strategic choices. These privilege employment creation
and dictate that policy be reoriented such that investment in labour-absorbing
activities be encouraged. Given that current imperatives rest upon the
productive employment of presently unemployed and abundant labour, and
the husbanding of relatively scarce capital, this strategy involves no
compromise with the efficiency-enhancing imperative of industrial strategy.
On the contrary, in marked contrast with the objectives of previous industrial
strategies, it is precisely concerned to ensure the efficient allocation
of the country's productive factors the extensive utilisation of the
abundant factor (unskilled and semi-skilled labour) and the intensive deployment
of capital and skilled labour (the relatively scarce factors of production).
Mega-Projects
- While the strategic orientation proposed here demands a review of the
effective support extended by previous governments to mega-projects, it
does not preclude public support for all large-scale capital-intensive
investments. There are a variety of reasons indirect employment opportunities,
skill enhancement and technological externalities are just three of the
most important why a particular project may be deemed worthy of public
support even if its initial direct impact on new employment opportunities
is limited.
- There are a number of natural-resource-based mega-projects in the early
phases of their development some are in the planning and feasibility
study phase, while others are on the verge of beginning the labour-intensive
process of constructing the plant. Every effort must be made to maximise
sustainable employment-creation opportunities from these investments. Clustering
ancillary industry around a large plant employing several hundred highly
paid workers appears to afford a promising prospect of employment growth.
We will also suggest a human resource development strategy designed to
enhance the future job prospects of those employed in the construction
phase.
- The government itself is committed to major investments in infrastructure.
The Commission welcome this approach. Sound infrastructure both social
infrastructure like housing and commercial infrastructure such as transport
underpins growth and further investment. Again, however, we would urge
specific attention to the creation of sustainable employment. Considerations
similar to those outlined with respect to the mega-projects apply. In particular,
there is a labour-intensive construction phase followed by a sharp decline
in employment directly associated with such projects. The current focus
on development corridors clearly represents an attempt to generate sustainable
employment clustered around infrastructural development and is welcomed.
A training component must also be built into these projects and is discussed
below.
Supporting Labour-Intensive Production
- The potential benefits flowing from our mega-projects notwithstanding,
it remains our general contention, our overall proposal, that South Africa's
industrial policymakers be required to account for their range of interventions
be these in the areas of trade policy, competition policy, technology
policy, or the allocation of industrial development capital with principal
reference to their impact on the prospects for strengthening of labour-intensive
production. We are, in other words, arguing for an industrial policy that
actively supports and rewards labour-intensive investment, as long as such
investments can be made sufficiently profitable to warrant directing scarce
capital resources in their direction.
- The industrial strategy of previous governments exhibits a clear bias
in favour of capital-intensive sectors. The most important policy measures
that supported this overall strategy were:
- monetary policies that maintained negative real interest rates for
sustained periods;
- a bias in the deployment of industrial development finance, principally
through the activities of the IDC but also through the Land Bank and other
institutions in favour of larger and more capital-intensive activities.
This bias is particularly evident in the case of "strategic"
investments in synfuel production and petroleum and recent investments
in aluminium smelting. In agriculture, the dominant form of government
support subsidised capital has also heavily favoured capital-intensive
sub-sectors and technologies;
- investment incentives such as accelerated depreciation and other tax-based
allowances;
- the increasingly explicit market orientation of publicly funded science
councils which biased their activities in favour of better resourced and
more technologically sophisticated firms and
- a trade regime which has effectively raised the cost of key intermediate
products thus militating against labour-intensive downstream activities.
This applies with equal strength to agriculture as it does to manufacturing.
- This policy bias in favour of large, capital-intensive investments
was powerfully exacerbated by measures that effectively stifled the rise
of dynamic small and medium scale enterprises. Draconian restrictions imposed
upon black ownership are extensively documented and effectively poisoned
the wellspring for dynamic small business growth. But the bias against
small business was not only an outcome of racial discrimination. It was
deeply embedded in the general conduct of industrial policy. The pillars
of this bias against SMMEs were found in:
- a notoriously weak competition policy which had little or no impact
on limiting economic concentration, including vertical integration arrangements
particularly hostile to new market entrants;
- state purchasing arrangements that favoured large established firms
at the expense of smaller firms and new entrants;
- export incentives that were heavily biased against small firms;
- poorly resourced institutional support in the areas of finance, technology
development, training and marketing for SMMEs; and
- a skills training system focused exclusively on formal apprenticeships
which prevented the small entrepreneur from either formally giving or receiving
training.
- Our capital-intensive economic structure is thus, to a significant
extent, policy-induced. An inchoate combination of policies bears a large
responsibility for our capital-intensive sectoral composition. Policy interventions
or their absence also account for our weak SMME profile, further strengthening
our capital-intensive bias.
- Re-orienting South Africa's industrial policy in order to achieve more
labour-intensive outcomes will clearly presuppose supportive interventions
within the traditional realm of labour market policy. However, the labour
market cannot, and should not, be expected to bear the full brunt of the
adjustment alone. To put it bluntly, for as long as the prices of other
key inputs for example, finance and electricity reflect historical
and current subsidies, then for so long will labour appear to be relatively
costly. Or, from another perspective, the labour market should not be made
to bear the full burden of facilitating new entrants in product markets
when it is the presence of particular institutional arrangements (and the
absence of others) in those very product markets, as well as in capital
markets, that underpin high levels of concentration in the first place.
In short, South Africa's product and capital markets are highly distorted.
To insist that labour market reforms alone compensate for the impact of
distortions in other markets is simply to compound, rather than solve,
the problem.
- The submission of the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) to the
Commission demonstrates that South Africa's current policymakers are aware
of the range of policy instruments at their disposal and, to some extent,
are deploying them in support of labour-intensive industrial development.
In particular, the Commission welcomes:
- the current commitment to a strengthened competition policy and the
apparent determination to elevate it from its historically low status in
the industrial policy armoury;
- the priority accorded by the Department of Trade and Industry to the
development of SMMEs, and the comprehensive range of measures and resources
deployed in support of this class of enterprise;
- the determination to expose local producers of key intermediates to
international competition, the better to ensure competitively priced inputs
for relatively labour-intensive downstream producers; and
- the efforts made to secure access by South African producers to international
markets, and the incorporation of SMMEs and other non-traditional exporters
or potential exporters in these efforts.
- However, from the perspective of the Commission's particular concerns,
we would want to see more determined action in the following areas:
A Refocus of IDC Support
- We urge more effective deployment of the IDC's resources in pursuit
of job creation. The Commission appreciates that refocusing an institution
like the IDC may be akin to turning a supertanker; we are also cognisant
that the lack of nimbleness of even supertankers is compensated for by
other qualities. However, the IDC must be mandated to accord higher status
in its investment decisions to their impact on employment creation. This
is a first-order priority of the IDC's shareholder, the South African government.
If it cannot meet this requirement, then it must be obliged to hand back
more of its resources to its shareholder for deployment in support of job
creation. We are persuaded that the IDC's activities in agriculture and
horticulture establish its potential as a creator of jobs; however, a disproportionate
share of its resources is devoted to very large, highly capital-intensive
projects, generally in partnership with a predictable array of well-resourced
corporations.
- We should add that this recommendation does not imply compromise with
the requirement that the IDC be self-financing and that commercial returns
weigh heavily in the IDC's investment decisions. Our point is simply that
just as the IDC supported investment in large, high-risk projects, by accepting
longer pay-back periods and by securing policy interventions designed to
reduce the level of risk for example the Section 37e depreciation allowances
so too must it lead investors back into sectors and projects that generate
significant amounts of employment. Again, as in the past, it will do this
via concessionary financing, but it will also insist on policy backing
that reduces its risk.
A Review of Commitment to Natural Resource Beneficiation
- The Commission recommends a re-examination of the widespread commitment
to natural resource beneficiation. Unfortunately the preoccupations for
which the IDC is frequently and, we believe, justifiably criticised
are widely shared both inside and outside government. We refer, in particular,
to the conventional wisdom that supports investment in natural resource
beneficiation. These projects consume large amounts of capital but generate
very little employment per unit of capital. Unless downstream producers
enjoy an unsubsidised price advantage over international competitors
and we would welcome interventions that attempted to secure this there
is no reason why a natural resource endowment should uniquely qualify South
Africa to undertake further processing activities, particularly those that
require such massive capital commitments.
- We should emphasise that this does not imply that natural resource
beneficiation is never an appropriate direction. It simply suggests that
the possession of a particular mineral does not necessarily imply comparative
advantage in its further processing. The costs of supporting a mineral
beneficiation project should be evaluated in the same way that the costs
of support for any other project are evaluated. For example, the possibility
of developing a sustainable comparative advantage in mineral processing
would be significantly enhanced were our firms not obliged to pay the world
price plus an imputed transport cost.
Policy Support
- Policy support should target labour-intensive production. An industrial
strategy is essentially characterised by the range of sectors and firms
that it seeks to strengthen. Numerous criteria have dominated these choices
in other countries entry into international markets has featured significantly
in the case of the Asian new industrialised countries; the desire to derive
technological externalities has dominated the industrial strategies of
other countries; South Africa's invoking of "strategic" (read:
"energy and military self-sufficiency") considerations in the
1970s and 80s, considerations which directed resources into the petrochemicals
and armaments industries, represented another industrial strategy.
- We are concerned at the present absence of an explicitly articulated
industrial strategy. Currently, our implicit industrial strategy directs
support at mineral beneficiation and, at the other end of the scale, SMMEs.
The former is, as we have already outlined, inappropriate; the latter is
insufficiently focused. Laudable though the decision to support SMMEs is,
it does not substitute for an industrial strategy. An appropriate industrial
strategy for South Africa is one which makes an efficient and effective
use of scarce capital resources. Given the need to create more employment,
industrial policy should be particularly sensitive to supporting labour-intensive
production methods.
- Support for SMMEs should then be principally directed at those within
the broadly defined sectors and subsectors listed in the following paragraph,
or those which demonstrate linkages to large enterprises and thus have
a relatively stable demand for their goods and services. This support will,
in part, be represented in a wage and productivity-enhancement strategy
as outlined in this Report. Other supply side strategies for example,
technology support programmes and access to credit are also vital
and are part of the DTI's current programme of support for SMMEs. A key
aspect of the support provided should be measures designed to enhance the
interaction between the SMMEs and the large firms within each sector.
- Some broadly defined economic sectors (such as clothing, furniture,
footwear, tourism, construction, metal fabrication and auto components)
have, across the available range of production techniques, higher labour/capital
ratios than other sectors (such as petrochemicals). South Africa has an
established presence in each of these areas which employ large numbers
of people and have the potential for international expansion. In each of
these sectors there are firms that, by the most rigorous standards, are
highly competitive: they export successfully and even in the absence of
protective tariffs will easily hold their own against global competitors.
But the performance of these competitive leaders stands in sharp contrast
with the great many laggards in each of the sectors in question. There
is thus a strong case for devising mechanisms to enhance the performance
of the laggard firms, by diffusing more widely the capabilities that characterise
the leading-edge firms. Factor prices must be appropriate to the character
of the activity in question and to the level of productivity achieved.
However, it is instructive that outstanding firms have performed successfully
in international markets by raising productivity. Their performance must
be the benchmark for our producers and for industrial policy makers intent
upon supporting productivity enhancement.
- We reiterate that the concept of a sector is often difficult to operationalise,
and that the boundaries between sectors are inexact. For this reason we
welcome the attempts by the DTI to identify competitive "clusters"
of firms as the potential sites of policy support. It should also be noted
that projects eligible for support may emerge in any sector. Moreover,
successful sectoral targeting does demand considerable institutional sophistication.
Sequencing Policy Interventions
- More effective sequencing of trade liberalisation and the introduction
of supportive supply-side measures is required. It is also important to
co-ordinate trade policy and exchange rate policy. The imperatives to limit
short-term job loss consequent upon trade reform, to maintain broad support
for the restructuring programme, and to retain the skills and discipline
acquired through work experience, emphasise the importance of getting this
sequence right.
Supporting Labour-Intensive Production: Labour Market Requirements
Wages and Productivity
- Wage levels are a significant component of overall cost structures
across the full range of these labour-intensive activities. Unless producers
are simply able to pass wage increases on to their customers a practice
limited by trade reform and increased domestic competition there will
be a persistent pressure to limit rising wage costs in labour-intensive
activities. In fact, as the South African economy becomes more open to
international competition, firms will only be able to survive if their
costs and productivity are comparable to those of their major international
competitors. This has implications for trade and industrial policy as well
as for labour market policy. At the very least, South African producers
must be able to obtain key intermediate inputs at internationally competitive
rates.
- Firms must also ensure that the relationship between wages and productivity
is comparable with that of their major international competitors. International
comparisons of unit labour costs effectively the combination of the level
of wages and the level of productivity are difficult to make. They are,
of course, sensitive to exchange rate movements and this means that, in
the recent past, as a result of the depreciation of the Rand, South African
wages, and hence unit labour costs, will have received a significant competitive
boost. One recent report, using composite wage and salary figures, concludes
that by international standards South African wages (especially unskilled
wages) are high relative to productivity, accounting then for high unit
labour costs. Another study, taking a more disaggregated view of the economy
and the labour force, draws more favourable conclusions with respect to
our unskilled and semi-skilled wage rates.
- However, there is clearly no room for complacency. Raising the productivity
of South African workers through training programmes, work-place changes
and industrial relations reform must be an integral and urgent part of
South Africa's restructuring agenda. These, and a host of other productivity
related measures, will enable South African firms to compete in those product
ranges where quality and reliability are core competitive features. We
have already noted the evidence of South African firms' ability to successfully
compete in these markets. It is here that South Africa's sustainable competitive
advantage lies and industrial policy must seek to shift the industrial
structure towards these broad market segments. We should however emphasise
that even in this broad product range, competitiveness remains enormously
sensitive to the relationship between wages and productivity.
- The long-term prospects for South African firms competing in lower
value-added product ranges dependent upon very low wages are not good.
However, even in these product ranges, productivity performance is important
and industrial policy must not ignore the opportunity for enhancing performance
here. This will offer a long-term solution to many of these firms. However,
the wage determination system must be sensitive to firms currently competing
in lower value-added product lines. This is elaborated in our wage determination
chapter where the system of extensions of wage agreements, the structure
of bargaining councils, and wages applicable to SMMEs are examined.
- Given South Africa's vast supply of unskilled, unemployed labour, it
is essential that the system of wage determination does not undermine firms
attempting to compete in lower-wage, lower value-added product lines. Industrial
policy must progressively encourage these firms to focus on improving their
product and on competing in more demanding product ranges. Accordingly,
just as the wage determination system should not seek to eliminate these
firms, nor should it eliminate any incentive for these firms to locate
themselves in those product segments that reflect South Africa's long-term
comparative advantage.
- The second set of measures designed to support a labour-intensive industrial
strategy is dealt with in Chapter 5. These are the interventions designed
to secure dynamic efficiency and x-efficiency. Many of these
interventions are directly in the sphere of the labour market, others not.
Most of these measures impact significantly on labour market processes
and outcomes. In our discussion of these interventions we will draw attention
to those efficiency-enhancing measures which engender positive employment
outcomes. For example, the introduction of multiple shifts significantly
increases capital productivity and creates employment opportunities. Furthermore,
innovation directed at the development of new products is often more employment-friendly
than innovation directed at the production process. These and other productivity-enhancing
measures are discussed in Chapter 5.
Human Resource Development
- Human resource development (HRD) widely recognised as a pivotal policy
issue is the subject of intensive examination inside and outside of government.
For this reason, it has not been included in the terms of reference of
this Commission. However, it is a critical component of any industrial
strategy including, the Commission believes, one designed to boost employment
creation through labour-intensive investment. Policy development in the
fields of education and training on the one hand, and economics on the
other, tend to occupy different worlds despite the unanimous acceptance
of their interconnectedness. The following paragraphs will tentatively
examine the interface between the industrial strategy outlined in this
chapter and human resource development and make preliminary proposals directed
at strengthening this interface.
- The combination of apartheid and an inward-oriented industrial strategy
was characterised by human resource development policies which resulted
in a deeply fractured national skills profile. The essence of these policies
was tertiary education for the managerial and professional few, trade training
at subsidised parastatals for young white men and perilously little else.
"Sitting next to Nelly", or learning from experienced workers,
was the best available to the majority. The underinvestment by firms in
education and training is documented in the ILO Review. These policies
underpinned work practices in the mining industry, in the capital-intensive,
resource-based processing sectors, and in the highly protected, mass-production
consumer goods sectors of manufacturing.
- The education and training system was broadly designed to serve these
ends. Sound general education for whites laid the basis for tertiary and
trade learning, while the black majority were educated to little more than
the level of in Verwoerd's notorious description - "hewers of wood
and drawers of water". Despite the growing demands of the manufacturing
and service sectors for additional skilled labour, tariff protection, steady
increases at the educational margin and immigration policy served to buffer
the society from the imperative to effect systemic change.
- For the vast majority of the population the heritage of this system
is mass illiteracy combined with an uneven array of unrecognised skills
built up from experience, ranging from trade equivalent for those who acted
as artisan-aides, to the more limited and tacit skills of those who performed
routine and repetitive tasks over decades. Those described as "semi-skilled"
and "unskilled" fall within this range. Those who have never
worked in the formal sector have an undescribed spectrum of traditional,
street and home knowledges which seldom translate into labour market currency
hence these people are also designated "unskilled".
- The magnitude of the task should not be underestimated. Apartheid's
scars are particularly apparent in the skills profile of the workforce.
A recent study showed, for example, that 45% of adult Africans cannot read
or write, while 35% of the economically active population in 1991 were
reported as functionally illiterate. This neglect is matched by the particularly
low level of commitment by the private sector to training. In South Africa,
an average of 1% of payroll is dedicated to training, while in the OECD
countries the figure is between four and seven percent. We are however
persuaded that we have the wherewithal to rapidly enhance the capacity
of our workforce to participate successfully in the activities identified
here.
- Our industrial strategy is intended to secure existing employment opportunities
for these "unskilled" and "semi-skilled" workers, and
to generate new employment opportunities for the millions without work
who fit this skills profile. To recap: our policy is intended to promote
employment growth in three areas:
- the product segments and sectors identified above;
- the construction phase associated with investment in social and commercial
infrastructure; and
- the construction phases of capital-intensive, resource processing plants,
although this employment is of a limited duration.
- The HRD strategy at the core of this growth and development trajectory
must be directed at the requirements of the manufacturing and services
sectors, those sectors where sustainable employment opportunities will
be created. In those sectors where large numbers of short to medium-term
job opportunities are created for the most part, civil engineering and
construction, but, in the natural resource-processing operations, also
involving the large mining and manufacturing corporations the focus must
be on providing a growing cadre of workers suitably equipped to enter the
manufacturing and services sectors.
Labour-Intensive Manufacturing and Services: the HRD Requirement
- For three decades apartheid's education and training approach supported
an industrial strategy that relied upon high-level (white) personnel, skilled
(predominantly white) supervisors and artisans, and a large body of (black)
"semi-skilled" and "unskilled" labourers. However,
the system proved unsustainable, principally because of the industrial
conflict for which it bore a considerable responsibility. In addition it
was incapable of adjusting to meet the requirements of new technologies,
small- and medium-scale producers, global competition and a changing industrial
relations environment.
- The HRD system was found wanting on all fronts:
- The ILO Review notes that the number of workers attaining artisan status
fell from 12 933 in 1985 to 7 132 in 1990. There are a number of influences
at play economic downturn and the privatisation and commercialisation
of some of the large parastatals, are clearly two of the most important.
But more fundamental factors are at issue. Essentially, in the face of
more integrated technologies, manufacturing requires more flexible and
varied skills. Old trade demarcations are too rigid and are being fragmented
on the one hand while being upgraded on the other. In short, the (structural,
as well as cyclical) demand for old-style artisans has declined.
- Commitment to training semi-skilled and unskilled workers has only
marginally increased from its extremely low base. The ILO Review's South
African Enterprise Labour Flexibility Survey (SALFS) finds however that
in no manufacturing firm did production workers account for more than 10%
of those receiving training in the past year. Again there are multiple
factors at play, particularly sustained economic downturn. However, the
absence of an appropriate strategy or institutional framework for the funding
and provision of training to these layers of the workforce is fundamentally
important.
- As already elaborated, our strategy rests in large part upon the ability
of the manufacturing, construction and services sectors to generate secure,
regulated and moderately remunerated employment. This requires steady,
sustainable increases in productivity and this, in turn, is powerfully
influenced by the quality of our human resources. Here follow some tentative
proposals aimed at significantly upgrading our human resources.
- Public resources should be allocated to promote investment in education
and training which would not otherwise occur, and which enhances the quality
and quantity of employment. Industry Training Boards (ITBs) have an important
role to play as intermediaries in the development of a framework for career-pathing
and quality assurance when agreements are reached by bargaining councils,
or in cross-sectoral forums at national, regional, local, and firm level.
- While the HRD requirements will differ between firms and sectors, the
following are likely to be common features:
- All learning should, wherever possible, be credit-bearing and portable,
to support dynamic career-pathing within and across firms and sectors.
- The HRD strategy for unskilled and semi-skilled workers should be one
of multi-skilling rather than being directed at providing a narrow
range of skills. The strategy should not reproduce the rigid and inflexible
nature of task-specific training. The ILO's SALFS reports that some firms
are indeed attempting to introduce multi-skilling at the workplace. The
successful implementation of multi-skilling strategies generally presupposes
complementary reforms of workplace organisation, reforms that move away
from the hierarchical features that characterise traditional manufacturing
practices based skilled artisan and supervisory labour on the one hand,
and unskilled labour on the other.
- Adult basic education. HRD strategies directed at semi-skilled and
unskilled workers are significantly limited by low levels of basic education,
principally reflected in the alarmingly low levels of literacy and numeracy
even among employed workers in the manufacturing sector. The ILO Review
notes, for example, that the mean number of years of schooling of the workforce
in the early 1990s was seven. The Commission is concerned at the apparent
lack of attention to the provision of basic education.
- Training should, where possible, be provided on full pay in working
time. The recently published Green Paper on employment standards devotes
considerable attention to rearranging working time and to reducing working
time. The Commission's view on this is elaborated in Chapter 5. Suffice
it to say here that an arrangement that maintains the number of weekly
working hours or reduces them only slowly, but that requires employers
to provide a specified number of hours of basic and, where appropriate,
more advanced, training and education in working time, seems to be a more
urgent requirement and one that will rebound to the long run advantage
of the recipients of the training;
- SMMEs are proliferating in the labour-intensive sectors that will benefit
from our industrial strategy. This is a global response to demands for
greater flexibility in the production process. The rise of labour-only
subcontractors in the construction industry is one example; sub-contracting
in deep-level gold mining indicates how far this phenomenon is capable
of spreading. The apparent proliferation of home-work and sub-contracting
into the informal sector in clothing, is another example. In some circumstances
there are public policy considerations that require the strict regulation
of this phenomenon. Occupational health and safety considerations justify
such regulation. The new Mine Health and Safety Bill imposes duties on
owners to train workers irrespective of whether they are employed by the
mine owner or the sub-contractor. However, trade unions would be ill-advised
to press for a general prohibition of sub-contracting or to insist on a
rigid adherence to old regulatory structures. An overly rigid regulatory
net will be torn asunder by market pressures as is strongly borne out in
the construction industry. Nor, on the other hand, would the requirements
of our industrial strategy be served by the proliferation of sweat shops
at the margins of production: it would be better to draw these SMMEs closer
to the mainstream of production by extending training facilities to these
enterprises. Training here should include entrepreneurial training where
contractual relations exist. Where contractual relations do exist, the
principal responsibility for ensuring the training should rest with the
principal firm in the contracting relationship. There is little doubt that
dynamic, as opposed to survivalist and harshly exploitative, SMMEs are
distinguished by the quality of their relationship with large established
firms. Insisting possibly with the help of public assistance that the
principal firm assumes responsibility for providing training to its subcontractor
will proliferate skills and cement inter-firm relations. Where no such
contractual relation to a larger firm exists, the restructured ITB should
be encouraged to provide assistance.
- Although our HRD strategy is focused on unskilled and semi-skilled
workers, the requirement to generate higher-level skills should not be
ignored. In particular, where high skill levels are in short supply, and
this leads to high wage differentials, expanding the supply through immigration
or education and training policy is desirable. This is further explored
in our discussion of wage determination (Chapter 4) and migration (Chapter
9). As already noted, it is widely accepted that the rigid, narrow view
of skills that characterises traditional approaches to artisan and task
training is not appropriate in the context of rapidly changing technologies
and markets. The Commission is encouraged by the recognition that this
has already received in some potentially important sectors for example,
the furniture industry is including business skills as a requirement within
their traditional trades. Their trade test evaluates skills required for
self employment estimating, costing, marketing and the like.
- As part of an attempt to promote dynamic efficiency, equity, skill
formation, work security and economic democracy within enterprises, it
may be useful to construct a nationally negotiated Human Development Enterprise
(HDE) Index. The purpose of the Index, as the ILO Review notes, would be
to provide a framework within which the human development enterprise can
be promoted. Firms would, within this framework, be rewarded for performing
well on the HDE Index. At the same time though, the performance of firms
in improving HRD at the workplace may be tracked. Possible details of the
Index are suggested in the ILO Review. The Commission supports the introduction
of such an Index through negotiation amongst the bargaining partners.
Capital-Intensive Projects: the HRD Requirements
- Our industrial strategy advocates that government redirects its support,
where appropriate, from highly capital-intensive, resource processing activities
to labour-intensive sectors. However, several projects are at the beginning
of their construction phase, and others are in the pipeline. South Africa's
natural resource bounty suggests that projects of this scale will be a
permanent part of the landscape. Such plants ultimately employ few people,
and those employed are at relatively high levels of skill. Here we would
restrict ourselves to the following observations:
- Companies should be encouraged to train workers as opposed to simply
poaching them from other projects and companies. One way of ensuring this
is via a flexible, case-by-case requirement that the projects, usually
based outside of the metropolitan areas, hire a minimum proportion of local
labour. This would inevitably presuppose the generation of new skills;
- The limitations of the artisan system as outlined above should
be carefully scrutinised here. The companies involved in these large projects
- for example ESKOM and ISCOR are among the larger providers of skilled
artisan training. Their participation in these large projects provides
a golden opportunity for piloting a systematic review of the country's
artisan training system.
- The labour-intensive phase is in the construction of the plant. For
example Saldanha Steel will employ 600 mostly skilled workers in the plant,
while 9,000 people will be employed for most of the 18-month construction
phase. Maximum advantage must be taken of this period to impart skills
and create sustainable job opportunities. To this end, the companies must
be required to train each worker involved in the construction phase to
a higher, formally accredited, level than that at which he or she entered
the project. One Commissioner argued that this was not a realistic proposal.
Companies must be encouraged to participate with other local stakeholders
in the development of a strategy aimed at contributing towards sustainable
output and employment growth in the region preferably as part of a social
accord process of the kind outlined in Chapter 10. IDC participation in
these projects should be conditional upon the company meeting these requirements.
- The Department of Labour's Labour Centres and sectorally based ITBs
should interact with District Development Plans and multi-stakeholder groupings
at local and regional level to assist with career planning and skill enhancement
and to ensure the quality of skill enhancement for affected workers.
Investment in Infrastructure
- Identical considerations apply with respect to the provision of commercial
infrastructure. The construction phase is labour-intensive and requirements
should be imposed on those who tender for the provision of the facilities
to impart accredited skills to those employed. The raison d'être
for the provision of commercial infrastructure is the economic activity
it generates. This, as suggested above, should be identified through the
preparation of a detailed economic development strategy for the region
served by the infrastructure.
- In the provision of the infrastructure, government may, unlike in the
traded goods sectors, choose production techniques on criteria other than
cost. This can only be decided on a case-by-case basis and employment creation
would obviously be a strong criterion determining choice of technique.
This is examined in our discussion of public works programmes.
Funding Training
- Alternative mechanisms for funding training are presently the subject
of a major tripartite-managed study in NEDLAC. There is little point in
the Commission attempting to pre-empt the study. We would simply note that
the social and private returns to both employer and employee are considerable
and there is a strong case for compelling those who benefit from training
to pay at least a proportion of the costs involved.
