Chapter 2
The Macroeconomic Environment for Labour Market Policies
- The two primary objectives animating the recommendations which follow
the eradication of poverty and the elimination of discrimination and
disadvantage cannot be met through labour market policy alone. A
favourable general economic environment will greatly assist the pursuit of
these goals. An unfavourable economic climate may weaken, or even defeat,
policies to restructure the labour market.
- National economic policy must, of course, pursue other objectives as well,
and trade-offs among competing objectives will be necessary. But the
requirement of overcoming poverty and discrimination must occupy an
important place in the shaping of general macroeconomic policies.
- A successful assault on poverty, inequality and discrimination is not only
a moral commitment of the South African government; it is also a
prerequisite for the attainment of other economic objectives. Failure to
address the legacy of apartheid, a legacy which sees millions employed at
levels below their true capabilities and others not at all, will cast a long
shadow of political uncertainty over South Africa's economic prospects.
While growth is a crucial means of achieving successful redistribution, the
Commission strongly argues that a degree of redistribution of existing
income flows is consistent with the goal of more rapid growth. The claim
that South Africa must preserve its extremely high degree of inequality in
order to foster growth is simply false. On this the international record is
clear: neither buoyant private investment nor monetary stability key
indicators of successful macroeconomic policies will survive the social
unrest and personal insecurity of a sharply divided and embattled society.
Nor is a highly unequal economy consistent with strong internal markets into
which the vast majority of domestically produced output must be sold.
- In this chapter we consider the role of macroeconomic policies. Though
beyond the strict terms of reference of the Commission, they impact greatly
on the success of the labour market restructuring process, and form a vital
backdrop to the recommendations made in other chapters of this Report. Here
we will not make detailed recommendations but rather raise issues for
consideration by the relevant policy-making bodies. Our caution in this
regard is motivated in part by the observation that the macroeconomic models
reviewed by the Commission and the various relevant government departments,
assign very different priorities to the various economic linkages and often
yielded conflicting results. Furthermore, the predictive value of empirical
macro-models is significantly reduced by the fact that the data upon which
they rest reflects the economic stagnation that accompanied the historically
unique circumstances of the crumbling of the apartheid system. This is not
to imply that macroeconomic models tell us nothing about the constraints
that bind the South African economy. For instance, most models agree that
South Africa experiences balance of payments constraints during growth
phases, which points to the need to improve export competitiveness.
- Macroeconomic policy must be consistent, co-ordinated, and oriented
towards the sustainable growth of output and employment. The labour market
is central to this endeavour. The Commission holds that the goal of labour
market policy should be to increase both flexibility and security in the
labour market, as defined in Chapter 1 of this Report and in the ILO Review.
The Commission rejects any exclusive reliance on the lowering of real wages
as a means of increasing employment. The burden of economic adjustment must
not fall on workers alone.
A Labour-Absorbing Growth Path
- While the government must play a leading role in ending poverty and
discrimination, these objectives cannot be addressed solely through
programmes that transfer income and other resources to South Africans
historically denied opportunities. Poverty and discrimination cannot be
overcome by redividing the cake alone; both objectives require an enlarged
cake based on a new structure of productive opportunities in the South
African economy.
- This simply restates a core position held by the Commission: job creation
is crucial to eliminating poverty and discrimination, but no less important
is job enhancement creating better jobs by recognising, developing and
rewarding the skills of working people.
- Expanding the employment of South Africans whether in the private or
the public sector of the economy requires the sustained growth of output
at levels considerably higher than that experienced over the past 15 years,
when real gross domestic product grew at an average annual rate of just
1.3%.
- Economic growth is necessary for job creation, but alone it is not
sufficient. Nor is economic growth by itself adequate to overcome the
historic deprivation of literally millions of South Africans. The welcome
return of the South African economy to a trajectory of economic growth in
recent years has generated disappointingly few jobs. The South African
Reserve Bank estimates that the past two years of modest economic growth
have generated a net increase of just 12 000 jobs in the formal,
non-agricultural economy, both public and private. The Commission notes,
however, that the employment figures used in this calculation differ by as
much as 2.5 million workers from the more comprehensive October Household
Survey figures, and may thus significantly understate the number of jobs
created in the formal economy, to say nothing of possible increases in
informal employment. The ILO Review provides a more detailed discussion of
the uncertainties surrounding employment estimates. The degree of
discrepancy underlines the position adopted in the ILO Review that better
employment data are urgently needed to facilitate policy formulation.
- South Africa cannot wait for the rising tide of economic growth to trickle
down to those in poverty. Economic and labour market policies must ensure
that South Africa follows a more labour-absorbing growth path which narrows
the gap between the haves and the have nots. The macroeconomic co-ordinates
of a labour-absorbing growth path are:
- Macroeconomic policies that support the steady, sustainable and
co-ordinated growth of demand for, and supply of, goods and services.
Demand growth without a corresponding supply response will result either
in inflationary pressures or balance of payments problems or both.
- Stable relationships among the social partners that will help ensure a
trajectory of prices, productivity, salaries, wages and taxes sufficient
to maintain adequate levels of private investment. The determinants of
stability and investment are explored in more detail below. Chapter 10
explores the crucial role that a national Accord for Employment and Growth
can play in contributing to a co-ordinated package of labour market and
macroeconomic policies.
- Exchange rate policies which do not prejudice domestic producers both
exporters and those producing in competition with importers and which
will avoid both the employment dampening effects of an overvalued rand and
the inflationary effects of excessively rapid depreciation. The Commission
does not take a position on the complex technical and political question
as to whether the exchange rate is currently under- or over-valued. We are
cognisant of the rand's recent significant depreciation against the other
major currencies, and of the fact that this depreciation would likely be
accelerated were the Reserve Bank to lower the interest rate. The
Commission also notes that the removal of exchange controls could have a
dramatic effect on the value of the rand, and hence argues that policy in
this area must be carefully sequenced with other policy reforms.
- Policies aimed at increasing access by labour-intensive businesses to
credit markets and reversing the historical legacy of favouring highly
capital-intensive investments. These are explored in Chapter 3.
- Public sector employment programmes to produce needed infrastructure in
the areas of housing and rural public works; these are discussed in
Chapter 7.
- Public investment to enhance the infrastructure of the growth process in
fields such as human resource development, transportation and
communication.
- The Commission thus rejects the view that policies impacting on interest
rates, the budgetary deficit, the exchange rate, and the rate of inflation
should be formulated without regard to their impact on employment creation.
The general view held by the Commission is that macroeconomic policy must be
designed with both its short-run and long-run effects on the level of
employment in mind. However, in like measure, we reject a narrow conception
of labour market policies: their effect on macroeconomic outcomes such as
economic growth, inflation, investment and global competitiveness must be
fully taken into account.
- The primary means by which labour market policies influence macroeconomic
outcomes is through the wage-determination process. When nominal wages
increase more rapidly than labour productivity, the result may be a more
rapid rate of inflation. While this linkage is well documented, it is
important to note that inflation (rising product prices) is neither
synonymous with nor caused solely by rising wage levels. In particular, the
degree of competition in product markets is a key factor in determining
whether firms are able to pass wage increases along to consumers in the form
of higher prices.
- The possible negative consequences of higher rates of inflation are
several. Firstly, higher rates of inflation may undermine investor
confidence and thus reduce the growth rate of the capital stock. Secondly,
higher rates of inflation reduce the living standards of the most vulnerable
members of society whose incomes are typically not indexed to inflation.
Third, higher rates of inflation may cause an appreciation of the real
effective exchange rate, reflecting higher unit labour costs, a reduction in
international competitiveness, and hence decreased profitability and
employment in export-oriented sectors. Otherwise stated, rapidly rising
wages may prevent nominal exchange rate depreciation from translating into
real depreciation.
- According to the South African Reserve Bank, real unit labour costs in the
non-agricultural economy reached a peak in 1992, and have since fallen by
about 5.5%. The Commission holds that further reductions in unit labour
costs are desirable, but observes that unit labour costs are determined by a
host of factors in addition to the blue-collar wage bill, including the
level of productivity, managerial efficiency, and the cost of white collar
salaries and wages. The recent depreciation of the rand has lowered South
Africa's unit labour costs relative to those of its major trading partners.
Furthermore, the impact on average unit labour costs of depressing unskilled
wages in some sectors is relatively small in comparison to the effects of
changes in the other determinants of unit cost. All of these factors must be
addressed as part of a coherent strategy to improve competitiveness and
productivity.
- The Commission recommends in Chapter 10 that a national Accord for
Employment and Growth be negotiated to help reduce the risk of
"wage-push" inflation. While acknowledging that the precise
dynamics of inflation are poorly understood, the Commission notes that
recent low levels of inflation are an encouraging development and may
provide policy makers with some room for manoeuvre on this front. However,
the Commission acknowledges that this room for manoeuvre is limited by the
rand's recent depreciation, which, by one estimate, may be expected to add
two percentage points to the rate of inflation of consumer prices in the
coming year.
- What is required is a co-ordination of labour market policies,
macroeconomic policies, and industrial, particularly trade-related,
policies. The major actors must recognise trade-offs where they exist, and
select policies in all areas in light of the full range of the objectives of
the government.
- One conspicuous example of the negative employment consequences of the
failure to co-ordinate policy reforms is the recent experience with tariff
reductions that were not offset by reductions in the value of the rand. The
result of reduced tariff protection without an offsetting reduction in the
value of the rand has been dramatic employment loss and increased imports in
certain labour-intensive sectors. While the rand's significant depreciation
in the first few months of this year has eased the pressure of competition
from imports somewhat, the Commission holds that the need to co-ordinate
exchange rate and tariff policies is a strong argument for the importance of
a comprehensive national Accord around these and other macro-variables, as
detailed in Chapter 10.
- Whether economic growth is jobless or employment creating, and whether it
deepens existing economic divisions or attenuates them, depends in important
part on the institutions and policies governing the growth process. The
Commission has identified two pillars of a growth strategy capable of
generating secure employment on a scale adequate to South Africa's needs:
investment and economic stability (the latter an outgrowth of the
institutional framework) and the quality of information flowing through
those institutions.
Investment for Jobs and Growth
- Investment in the South African economy stagnated in the decade prior to
the formation of the Government of National Unity. In 1983 gross domestic
fixed investment was 26.8% of GDP, while in 1993 this figure stood at 15.5%.
- Despite the more favourable investment record achieved in 1995, when gross
domestic fixed investment rose by 10.5%, the promotion of investment and the
installation of new plants and equipment remains a central challenge.
- As important as the total amount of investment is the form which it takes.
New equipment may destroy jobs or it may create them; massive investment in
sectors or projects employing few will do little to address the jobs
problem, at least not in the short or medium term. Thus the scale of
investment, its distribution among sectors of the economy, and the actual
technologies chosen by investors all have an impact on the rate of job
generation. The sectoral composition of investment and technology choice is
dealt with in Chapter 3 of this Report. Here we are concerned with the
overall determinants of investment.
- Much is confidently asserted about the best way to foster a strong
investment climate. However, the subject remains controversial. Common sense
suggests that investment will take place when:
- There is a demonstrated need for new productive capacity. The level of
demand for goods and services must be sufficiently great to be pressing on
existing capacity.
- Investors are satisfied with the basic "rules of the game"
governing business and are confident that these rules will endure for the
duration of their investment.
- The after-tax returns on investment are sufficiently high both to
motivate expansion of capacity and to provide (some of the) funds for
future investment.
- The cost of borrowing funds for the purpose of productive investment
(and the returns to using these funds for speculative, financial or other
non-productive purposes) is sufficiently low to render productive
investment profitable relative to other options. The Commission notes with
concern that the Reserve Bank's inflation-fighting policies have resulted
in one of the highest real interest rates in the world. This has
unquestionably inhibited the rate of domestic investment, particularly by
small enterprises. Likewise, consumers' ability to borrow for the purpose
of purchasing housing is impaired by high real interest rates, with
negative implications for the labour-intensive housing construction
industry.
- There exists the prospect for stable and productive relations between
labour and management over the long term.
- There is overwhelming evidence for South Africa and internationally
of the importance of growth in demand as a determinant of private
investment. For example, the demand-side determinants of investment were
emphasised in a recent analysis by the Reserve Bank which attributed the
healthy growth in investment in consumer goods and durables in part to
growth in demand from consumers, bolstered by increases in the real
remuneration of employees. But we should caution that demand growth by
itself is not sufficient. The other supports for investment must also be in
place. Expenditure-generating policies which have little other economic
rationale will not support high levels of investment except in the very
short run.
- None of the above-mentioned determinants of investment requires the
complete elimination of inflation. Instead, national policies should address
each of these preconditions through co-ordinated fiscal, monetary,
industrial and labour market policies. The Commission holds that such
co-ordination will be best achieved by a process of national, tripartite
negotiations around wages, prices and investment, as outlined in Chapter 10.
In the absence of such an Accord, concern with inflation leads to a reliance
on the relatively blunt instruments of fiscal and monetary tightening, both
of which have negative effects on the level of employment in the short run.
- The Commission heard conflicting arguments over the relation between
interest rates and the public debt. Reduced interest rates might lower the
government's cost of deficit finance, freeing up funds for more productive
purposes. However, others argue that lower short-term interest rates will
generate inflationary expectations that will raise the cost of long-term
public finance.
- It is also clear that an excessively rapid reduction of public investment
can reduce the growth rate of the capital stock, both directly though its
effects on the public capital stock and indirectly insofar as public and
private investment are complementary. Recent evidence of this
complementarity, or "crowding in", may be found in an analysis by
the Reserve Bank that lists progress in rural electrification as one of the
sources of increased consumer demand for durable electrical appliances,
which has in turn spurred investment in that sector. These effects certainly
mitigate, and may even overpower, the investment-dampening effect of higher
interest rates caused by public borrowing.
- These caveats notwithstanding, we do caution against a profligate approach
to public expenditure. We acknowledge that, at 5.5% of GDP, the fiscal
deficit for the 1995/96 financial year is high and if, in the event of an
economic downturn, it mushrooms, it could rapidly prove to be unsustainable.
This would then involve extremely harsh cuts and, all else aside, this would
severely dampen investment. On the other hand, the unique requirements of
the current historic transition to a democratic government and the urgency,
both economic and political, of delivering on the promises of the RDP,
provide a compelling case for the value of public borrowing in the short
term. The current issue is then less one of arguing against fiscal
restraint, than about arguing for greater efficiency in delivery of public
goods, although we acknowledge that efforts to improve the performance of
the public sector may involve costly initial outlays. For example,
"rightsizing" the public sector requires more than a simple
arithmetic reduction in the number of public sector employees or the size of
the public sector wage bill. It also requires restructuring public sector
employment and public sector wages. Hence, the leap in the public sector
wage bill allowed for in the recent budget, a leap occasioned by the need to
restructure public sector employment and wages, could be consistent with the
longer-term objective of containing public sector expenditure, even though,
in the short term it results in an increase in this expenditure. The
Commission welcomes the government's expression of concern with the issue,
as manifested by the appointment of the Presidential Review Commission on
the Public Service.
- Our argument also supports the re-prioritisation of public expenditures.
In the next chapter we suggest a focus on publicly funded programmes that
most successfully target the poor. We also welcome the commitment of the
government to public investment in productive infrastructure as well as the
commitment to recoup these investments through user charges. A favourable
investment climate requires adequate levels of public expenditure to
maintain and enhance South Africa's transportation and communication
infrastructure and to break the education and skills bottlenecks which
retard growth.
The Requisites of Economic Stability
- An institutional and policy-setting environment capable of stimulating
investment and a labour-demanding growth path must go considerably beyond
matters of interest rates and fiscal deficits. What is needed is that all
economic players large and small, public and private have a reasonable
expectation that they will benefit from the economic contribution that they
make and correspondingly that they will incur the costs that their decisions
entail. A currency whose real value is predictable is a part of this
institutional framework, but alone it is hardly sufficient. For economic
stability much more is required, including:
- The policy commitments of the government must be credible; they must not
be subject to unanticipated changes or reversal which may drastically
change the calculus of profit and loss or the simple requirement of making
ends meet.
- Labour relations between employees and employers will never be entirely
free of conflict, but they should be predictable, and agreements secured
should not later be undone. In this regard, the Commission welcomes the
strengthened dispute resolution mechanisms contained in the LRA and, in
particular, the establishment of a publicly funded, independent dispute
settling institution. The Commission holds that such mechanisms both
reduce the frequency of industrial conflict and lower the costs of
conflict when it does occur by providing for its more rapid resolution.
- These are the requisites for the economic stability which South Africa now
needs in order to foster investment and economic growth. As the experience
of many Latin American economies demonstrates, none of these is likely to be
achieved in a deeply divided society, one marked by enduring discrimination
and mass unemployment. It is equally clear that these conditions cannot be
met by a rigid, blunt commitment to downsizing government: much of what is
required, whether it be security services, growing aggregate demand, or
stable labour relations, cannot be supplied only by private individuals
pursuing private interests.
- Indeed, comparisons among nations indicate that the factors which foster
high levels of both domestic and international investment, especially direct
investment, have surprisingly little to do with the size of the public
sector, tax concessions, the trade balance, or the rate of inflation. Rather
it is the absence of high levels of social polarisation, extreme inequality,
and the social tensions occasioned by these, and the presence of adequate
human resources and growing aggregate demand which appear to drive the
investment process. International investment is now flocking to China, a
country which meets very few of the orthodox criteria for a favourable
investment climate. One of the widely accepted lessons to be gleaned from
the rapid economic ascendancy of many East Asian economies is the value of
institutional arrangements that ensure that the benefits of growth are
widely shared.
- The Commission believes that broadening the concept of economic stability
to include these foundations of successful economic growth and employment
generation would provide a framework in which macroeconomic and labour
market policies could be co-ordinated in the pursuit of common objectives.
- Fiscal and monetary policy must respond to a diverse set of objectives
reflecting not only a larger public interest but also the needs of those
groups closely affected by its impacts. Monetary stability and the interests
of the financial community are prominent among these concerns. But it is an
outdated and, often, self-serving fiction to think that monetary and
fiscal policy and labour market policy play themselves out in separate
arenas, with little impact of one upon the other. For this reason, the
Commission urges that job generation and the interests of the employed and
the unemployed be given an adequate hearing in the formulation of
macroeconomic policy.
- As stressed from the outset of this chapter, the Commission does not wish
to make detailed recommendations around macroeconomic policy. Instead we
have attempted to present a balanced view of the relation between the labour
market and the macro economy, and of the constraints that each imposes upon
the other. We hold that labour market policy reforms must work in
conjunction with employment-stimulating macro policies, with neither being
relied upon as the sole solution to the present employment crisis. We note
that increased investment is required for employment creation, and that the
stability of economic, industrial, and political relations is a crucial
precondition for investment. We further argue that both stability and the
degree of co-ordination of policies can be increased by means of a
nationally negotiated Accord around wages, prices, investment and other
macro-economic variables, as described in Chapter 10.
