- As stated above, the aim of the labour market reforms proposed here is to
balance the requirements of flexibility with the need for security. The ILO
Review identifies various forms and levels of flexibility. A distinction is
drawn between employment flexibility (the ability to change
employment levels quickly and easily); wage flexibility (rapidly
changing absolute and relative wage levels with the possibility of wide wage
gaps between sectors and occupations); and work process flexibility
(the easy and low-cost alteration of work tasks, times and practices). It is
argued that each form of flexibility has its advantages, but each can also
be taken too far. For example, if hiring and firing are too easily
accomplished (a case of excessive employment flexibility) this may
discourage firms and workers from investing in firm-specific,
productivity-enhancing skills, and may also lead to short-sighted physical
investment decisions by firms.
- The trajectory of South Africa's industrial strategy must shift from one
that has devoted considerable resources to supporting the capital-intensive
end of the South African economy, including such industries as mineral
beneficiation, paper and pulp, and petrochemicals. The major thrust of
policy support and public resources must turn decisively towards those
sectors and processes that employ large numbers of relatively unskilled
workers and semi-skilled operatives and machinists per rand of fixed
investment. We refer here to a range of activities clothing, furniture,
construction, tourism, metal fabrication, auto components are some examples
all of which are potentially large employers in which South Africa has
considerable established capacity.
- There are forms of flexibility particularly work process flexibility
that are often highly valued by workers. However, it is clearly acknowledged
that, in general, workers and their representatives associate flexibility
with insecurity, and this constitutes the basis of worker and union
opposition to flexibility. Again, the Review details different forms of
security: labour market security (widespread opportunities for
employment); employment security (protection from arbitrary loss of
employment); job security (protection against arbitrary transfer
between sets of work tasks and loss of job-based rights); work security
(health and safety protection in employment); income security
(protection against arbitrary reduction in incomes); and representation
security (secure capacity to bargain and influence the character and
terms of employment).
- As was argued above, the necessary balance between flexibility and
security is best achieved through the mechanism of voice regulation, in
particular, by means of bargained arrangements between, strong, stable and
well-informed employer and employee representatives. The ILO's position is
clearly summarised in the following paragraph:
The competing or conflicting set of concerns for employers and for
workers both need to be taken into account, as do those of the more
marginalised or vulnerable on each side of the spectrum. They cannot be given
their due weight if one party or the other is enfeebled or fragmented. This is
ultimately why 'voice' mechanisms, or representative institutions, are
required, even though the neo-liberal supply side advocates of flexibility and
"de-regulation" regard institutions and regulations as rigidities
and the main source of inflexibility. Those sirens of de-regulation are wrong,
because unless flexibility is bargained between strong negotiators,
opportunism would lead to short-term gains by one side or another usually
large-scale, powerful employers that would have long-term adverse
consequences for dynamic efficiency.
- We should emphasise that providing a degree of labour market security is
not simply a political imperative in a democratic society; it is also an
effective economic strategy. For example, in a society where employers and
government demonstrate a commitment to ensuring employment security
(protection against arbitrary loss of employment), workers are far more
likely to accept a strong degree of work process flexibility, and indeed of
wage flexibility as well. The success of many of the rapidly growing East
Asian economies was predicated on just this sort of combination of security
with flexibility, the one being used to purchase the other. This was not
brought about by governments acquiescing to demands for industrial
democracy, but rather by their blunt determination to foster economic
growth.
- The concern for the proper balance between security and flexibility runs
through each of the chapters of this Report. Chapter 4 presents a proposal
for a minimum wage-setting mechanism that aims to extend minimum wage
protection to all sectors of the economy, while stressing the need for an
incremental approach that is sensitive to the differences between regions
and sectors. The chapter also discusses the role of the bargaining councils
and the question of the extension of council agreements to non-parties. Here
too the Commission's recommendations, while staying within the framework of
the Labour Relations Act, involve a move in the direction of flexibility by
granting the Minister of Labour more discretion in deciding whether or not
to extend council agreements. The Commission also argues that small
businesses should be given greater voice in the bargaining councils, and
recommends several mechanisms designed to strengthen their participation.
- To increase productivity both management and labour must be willing to
adapt to new forms of workplace organisation. Chapter 5 argues that this
flexibility will be best achieved through consultation between the relevant
stakeholders. The Workplace Forums should facilitate this discussion at the
level of the firm, while the bargaining councils must address the question
of productivity at the industry level. The Commission also sees a role for a
tripartite campaign around productivity enhancement at the national level.
- Periods of rapid and deep-seated economic restructuring also demand high
levels of flexibility and are associated with high levels of labour-market
insecurity. The mode of regulating this structural change is particularly
important: overly prescriptive and bureaucratic mechanisms run the risk of
freezing the restructuring process, while a reliance on market forces in
periods of structural change understandably generates particularly high
levels of insecurity and resistance. Regulated participation by the social
partners in the process of economic restructuring is vital. This is
elaborated in Chapter 6, where proposals for a Social Plan Fund are
presented.
- Chapter 7 proposes reforms to the Unemployment Insurance Fund (UIF)
designed to increase the income security of the unemployed by extending UIF
coverage to all sectors of the economy. One of the crucial recommendations
is the implementation of individual record keeping, which will allow workers
to know the extent of contributions on their behalf. This provides a form of
voice regulation that will help increase the rate of compliance by
employers. The chapter then discusses reforms to the Community Based Public
Works Programme designed to ensure that it has a stable financial base and
that its effectiveness is more closely monitored. The Commission recommends
that local communities be given greater voice in the design of public works
programmes through their local government representatives.
- The advantages of an inclusive and participatory process are further
stressed in relation to employment equity programmes, in Chapter 8. Few
would argue that market forces alone are sufficient to overcome the
consequences of systemic discrimination. On the other hand, the dangers of
rigid, prescriptive legal regulation as expressed, for example, in a
quota system are also widely appreciated. Our proposal for affirmative
action avoids both of these extremes, and emphasises the important role that
collective bargaining and participatory workplace structures can play in
developing employment equity plans.
- In Chapter 9 we recommend a thorough overhaul of immigration law that
would replace the current patchwork of provisions with a single framework.
The Commission argues that access to the South African labour market must
still be regulated, but that the long-term goal should be a movement towards
open borders. This would be facilitated by regional co-operation around
economic development that would narrow the economic gap between South Africa
and its neighbours. In the short term, we recommend a series of measures
designed to increase the labour market security, and reduce abuses by
employers, of non-citizens.
- The approach to labour market policy outlined above, unlike the strategy
of simple deregulation, is entirely consistent with the government's recent
decisive reorientation of the domestic environment for labour market policy.
The broad objectives of labour market policy evidenced in the government's
fundamental orientation in the Constitution and in the RDP have been given
institutional structure in the Labour Relations Act (LRA) and in the
creation of the National Economic Development and Labour Council (NEDLAC).
The new LRA strongly underlines government's support for collective
bargaining and provides mechanisms for employee participation in decision
making at the factory-floor and the sectoral level. The NEDLAC Act further
provides for employer and employee participation in national economic policy
formulation.
- The Commission strongly endorses this approach. The industrial relations
system enshrined in the LRA and the approach to policy formulation adopted
in the NEDLAC Act further consolidate the democratic transformation led by
the government. In this light, the Commission stresses the importance of
ensuring that the multipartite institutions allow the less powerful interest
groups to have a strong voice in the debate. For NEDLAC this implies that
the Development Chamber must be treated as a full partner in all
negotiations. For the bargaining councils it implies increasing the
participation of small business; for the Wage Board it means keeping the
concerns of the unemployed on the agenda. Proposals to achieve these
outcomes are made in Chapter 4. Finally, in Chapter 10, we discuss means by
which regional social accords may be used to improve the degree of
grassroots participation in economic affairs, including around questions of
the regional impact of economic restructuring in the economy, with the aim
of giving voice to the most marginalised members of our society.