Supreme Court of Appeal
![SABC v DA (393/2015) [2015] ZASCA 156](https://cisp.cachefly.net/assets/articles/images/resized_medium/0000476975_resized_gavelandscalesofjustice1022.jpg)
SABC v DA (393/2015) [2015] ZASCA 156
9th October 2015 The Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) dismissed the appeal by the South African Broadcasting Corporation SOC Ltd (SABC), the Minister of Communications... →
![Centre for Child Law v The Governing Body of Hoerskool Fochville (156/2015) [2015] ZASCA 155](https://cisp.cachefly.net/assets/articles/images/resized_medium/0000476968_resized_law11022.jpg)
Centre for Child Law v The Governing Body of Hoerskool Fochville (156/2015) [2015] ZASCA 155
9th October 2015 On 1 December 2011 the respondents in the present appeal, the Governing Body of Hoërskool Fochville, as the first applicant, and Hoërskool... →
![DDP Valuers (Pty) Ltd v Madibeng Local Municipality (233/2015) [2015] ZASCA 146](https://cisp.cachefly.net/assets/articles/images/resized_medium/0000474341_resized_gavel21022.jpg)
DDP Valuers (Pty) Ltd v Madibeng Local Municipality (233/2015) [2015] ZASCA 146
2nd October 2015 The Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) upheld an appeal against a judgment of the Gauteng Division of the High Court, Pretoria. The appeal related to... →
![Dalindyebo v S (090/2015) [2015] ZASCA 144](https://cisp.cachefly.net/assets/articles/images/resized_medium/0000474333_resized_lawbooksistock1022.jpg)
Dalindyebo v S (090/2015) [2015] ZASCA 144
2nd October 2015 Fair trial rights – complaint concerning delay in prosecution – held that largely due to conduct of appellant himself – complaint concerning... →
![Minister of Correctional Services and Others v Seganoe (20507/2014) [2015] ZASCA 148](https://cisp.cachefly.net/assets/articles/images/resized_medium/0000474329_resized_law11022.jpg)
Minister of Correctional Services and Others v Seganoe (20507/2014) [2015] ZASCA 148
2nd October 2015 The Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) upheld an appeal by Minister of Correctional Services (the Minister), against an order by the Gauteng Local... →
![Desmond Ettienne Doman v Kgabo Gabriel Selomo (20455/2014) [2015] ZASCA 124](https://cisp.cachefly.net/assets/articles/images/resized_medium/0000470622_resized_law11022.jpg)
Desmond Ettienne Doman v Kgabo Gabriel Selomo (20455/2014) [2015] ZASCA 124
22nd September 2015 Summary: Power of court of appeal – power in terms of s 16(2)(a)(i) of the Superior Courts Act 10 of 2013 to dismiss appeal where judgment or order... →
![De Villiers v S (20367/2014) [2015] ZASCA 119](https://cisp.cachefly.net/assets/articles/images/resized_medium/0000467606_resized_lawofficeb1022.jpg)
De Villiers v S (20367/2014) [2015] ZASCA 119
14th September 2015 The Supreme Court of Appeal today upheld an appeal from the Gauteng Local Division which had confirmed a regional court’s sentence of the appellant... →
![Muldersdrift Sustainable Development Forum v Council of Mogale City (20424/2014) [2015] ZASCA 118](https://cisp.cachefly.net/assets/articles/images/resized_medium/0000467598_resized_law11022.jpg)
Muldersdrift Sustainable Development Forum v Council of Mogale City (20424/2014) [2015] ZASCA 118
14th September 2015 The Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) dismissed an appeal by the Muldersdrift Sustainable Development Forum, a residents’ association against Mogale... →
![Novartis v Maphil (20229/2014) [2015] ZASCA 111](https://cisp.cachefly.net/assets/articles/images/resized_medium/0000463938_resized_law11022.jpg)
Novartis v Maphil (20229/2014) [2015] ZASCA 111
3rd September 2015 Summary: Contract comprising written document, oral agreement and emails enforceable: evidence demonstrated intention to conclude contract in this... →
![African Information Technology Bridge 1 v The MEC for Infrastructure Development Gauteng Province (134/2014) [2015] ZASCA 104](https://cisp.cachefly.net/assets/articles/images/resized_medium/0000442970_resized_law11022.jpg)
African Information Technology Bridge 1 v The MEC for Infrastructure Development Gauteng Province (134/2014) [2015] ZASCA 104
3rd July 2015 Summary: Tender procedure - contracts vitiated by fundamental justus error and therefore invalid and unforceable - appeal dismissed →
