We have detected that the browser you are using is no longer supported. As a result, some content may not display correctly.
We suggest that you upgrade to the latest version of any of the following browsers:
close notification
This appeal concerns two separate but interrelated disputes between respondent and first and second appellants respectively. Briefly, on 29 November 2010 the Competition Tribunal (‘the...
This is an application seeking declaratory orders as well as reviewing and setting aside the decision of the second respondent the Chief land Claims Commissioner.
It has been brought to my attention that there is an obvious error in paragraph [10] of the judgment in this matter which was handed down on 23 February 2011. The following sentence appears in...
It has been brought to my attention that there is an obvious error in the order handed down in the above judgment of 17 February 2011. Paragraphs [26] to [28] of the judgment read as follows:
The applicant, by way of review, sought to set aside a decision of the respondent (Commission) not to place the applicant’s name on the list of registered parties entitled to contest the election...
The two appellants in this appeal, (Yara South Africa (Pty) Ltd and Omnia Fertilizer Ltd) are South African companies which conduct business as producers, importers, distributors and suppliers of...
1. Does the commissioner in con-arb proceedings in terms of s 191(5A) of the Labour Relations Act1 have a discretion whether to adjourn the proceedings after conciliation and before the arbitration...
1. The applicant municipality seeks the confirmation of a rule nisi, which was handed down by agreement with the respondent union on 15 April 2010. The rule read: