We have detected that the browser you are using is no longer supported. As a result, some content may not display correctly.
We suggest that you upgrade to the latest version of any of the following browsers:
close notification
Yuni
s Shaik, lawyer to former transport minister Mac Maharaj and
foreign affairs official Mo Shaik on Thursday cautioned against
one-sided reporting of the proceedings at the Hefer Commission of
Inquiry.
Retired Judge Joos Hefer is investigating claims by Maharaj and
Shaik's brother, Mo, that National Director of Public Prosecutions
Bulelani Ncguka was a spy for the apartheid security establishment
and that he has abused his current position.
In an apparent reference to questions over Shaik and Maharaj's
absence from the hearings on Wednesday and Thursday, Yunis Shaik,
in a long statement, said Hefer had directed his clients to testify
about their allegations on November 17.
The statement was released amid mounting pressure on the trio to
provide hard evidence to back their allegations.
The commission again officially requested them this week to provide
documentation to prove the claim.
In his response, Yunis Shaik said the commission last week also
undertook "at the urging of my clients to source and procure
various documents of relevance".
Shaik said the reason for this was that his clients needed to
retrieve, at short notice, evidence that had been stored away for
many years.
"Ngcuka's spokesman Sipho Ngwema has accused my clients of
'manufacturing' evidence and documents relating to the (African
National Congress) investigation into Mr Ngcuka.
"We therefore saw it fit to recommend that original documents and
files handed over to the state intelligence agencies by the ANC be
sourced to dispel the notion that my clients are engaged in a
sinister campaign aimed at discrediting Mr Ngcuka," Shaik
said.
He added that the postponement had, however, resulted in a barrage
of one-sided evidence being presented to the commission -- and
reported in the media.
The three had "no problem" with this because they believed once Mo
Shaik and Maharaj presented their evidence a different picture
would emerge.
However, it was difficult for them to continuously respond in the
media to testimony, allegations and versions of events as they
arose at the commission.
"This impacts on, and could prejudice, the evidence they are to
present to the commission. I would like to point out that my
clients volunteered their assistance to the commission but they are
required to pay their own legal, travel and accommodation costs.
This is proving to be an impediment to us appearing before the
commission on a daily basis to cross-examine witnesses and provide
further assistance to the commission," Shaik said.
"My clients are not conducting their own investigation into the spy
allegations, as is being reported in the media, but are rather
verifying information which they are to present to the
commission.
They are perfectly entitled to do so."
Shaik said the commission was told on Wednesday by evidence leader
Kessie Naidu that he had been called by commission secretary John
Bacon regarding the alleged confession this week by Vanessa
Brereton that she was agent RS452.
"I wish to state that I was not aware that my response was to be
entered into the record of the commission. It is true that I told
Bacon that it was never my client's contention that the National
Director of Public Prosecutions Bulelani Ngcuka was Agent
RS452."
"I wish to draw the media's attention to the front page lead in
City Press on Sunday, September 14, where the concept of 'false
flagging', particularly in the context of Ngcuka's case, is
explained."
The story stated that the RS-number was used as a "false flag" to
hide the agent's identity.
The concept was further explained by Mo Shaik in an eTV documentary
on the spy allegations screened on September 16.
"My clients stand by their earlier statements regarding the
investigation into Mr Ngcuka conducted under Project Bible. The
admission by Brereton that she was Agent RS452 does not in any way
affect the substance of the investigation that was conducted by ANC
intelligence. My clients will provide further detail on the matter
when they begin their testimony to the Hefer Commission on November
17."
Shaik urged the public to resist the temptation to draw conclusions
on the matter before hearing all sides of the story.
He also said the commission needed respect and should not be
undermined by a "parallel media inquiry".
Hefer on Thursday said the Shaiks and Maharaj would have to apply
to recall witnesses if they wanted to cross-examine those who
testified before the commission while they did not attend.
The judge would then make a ruling only after considering their
reasons.
Ngcuka's former comrade-in-arms Letha Jolobe testified on
Thursday.
He averred that Maharaj was apparently fishing for clues to
substantiate his allegations against Ngcuka. Maharaj had contacted
Jolobe to inquire about Ngcuka's activist past only after the
accusations had been levelled, Hefer was told - Sapa