We have detected that the browser you are using is no longer supported. As a result, some content may not display correctly.
We suggest that you upgrade to the latest version of any of the following browsers:
close notification
Date
: 06/12/2005
Source: Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism
Title: van Schalkwyk: European Climate Platform (ECP) event on
improving functioning
Keynote speech by Marthinus van Schalkwyk, South African
Minister of Environmental Affairs & Tourism, at the European
Climate Platform (ECP) event on improving the functioning of the
Clean Development Mechanism, Montreal, Canada
SECURING THE FUTURE OF THE GLOBAL CARBON MARKET: IMPROVING THE CDM
- KEY FOR DEVELOPING NATIONS
The concepts of binding international obligations and shared
multi-lateral actions are the bed-rock of the United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), the Kyoto
Protocol, and its Clean Development Mechanism (CDM).
As the leaders charged with translating this political will into
concrete action, we all too often lose sight of the overarching
global imperative. When days are spent negotiating the position of
three lines of bracketed text, we often find clarity replaced by
confusion. The reality must never be allowed to fade: we meet, not
to wring out short-term economic concessions, but rather to chart a
way forward on a global crisis that threatens the very survival of
the world as we know it.
It would not, I believe, be wrong to say that we arrive in Montreal
with the highest of expectations, and a deeply rooted optimism that
we will leave on Friday committed to a clearly defined Montreal
Mandate to achieve a two track paradigm of multilateral action
beyond 2012; in other words, to operationalise a Kyoto Plus
regime.
In focusing these two weeks of deliberations on the three
inter-related objectives of implementation, improvement and
innovation, Canada has brought new direction to these
discussions.
Without disrupting the market, or setting back the progress already
achieved through the CDM, we believe however, that there is a need
to constructively evaluate the CDM, to consider the early lessons
and improve the CDM. There is also an urgent need to give a clear
policy signal to the investment community on the security and scope
of the carbon market after 2012. In other words, we need to fix the
CDM in the short term, and provide a loud and clear policy signal
for the second commitment period.
This will be best achieved by an unwavering commitment to growing
the carbon market through deeper emission reduction targets in the
developed world, in line with commitments as clearly specified and
legally mandated in Article 3.9 of the Kyoto Protocol. To prevent
further dangerous interference with the climate system, we believe
that it will be necessary for Annex I Parties to make substantially
deeper emission cuts during the second commitment period. This is
the first track.
At the same time, we understand clearly that developing countries
need to do more in terms of their differentiated responsibilities,
but that absolute targets are not appropriate for developing
countries. It will not be easy to convince all developing countries
to do more and to accept more specific responsibilities if some
developed countries continue to disregard their responsibilities.
But as global citizens, developing countries understand, or should
understand, that there are also common responsibilities and that
this requires positive action.
In this respect, we believe it will be possible to agree on a
programme of action for developing countries to fully implement
existing commitments and provisions under the Convention. This
could be given concrete content through a work programme following
an approach of positive incentives for actions that simultaneously
promote local sustainable development, and reduce and avoid
greenhouse gas emissions in a manner appropriate to national
circumstances. It will be critical that such an incentive based
approach balances adaptation and mitigation actions. This is the
second track.
South Africa is strongly committed to the CDM
The theme of our dialogue this evening falls squarely within the
ambit of the COP President's second objective - improvement, while
at the same time bringing high levels of innovation to bear,
especially in building a strong carbon market beyond 2012, and
encouraging a programmatic approach to the CDM,.
South Africa views the CDM as an important vehicle for innovative
international cooperation to channel new investment in developing
countries towards projects that support the achievement of
sustainable development objectives; for introducing climate change
friendly technologies; and as an opportunity for capacity building
through collaborative efforts with developed nations.
As many here tonight will know, South Africa is actively engaged in
the carbon markets and emissions derivative trading. We are open
for business under the CDM. The first CDM project in South Africa
has been registered, installing efficient lighting, solar water
heaters, and better insulation in low-income housing in Kuyasa,
Khayelithsa in the Western Cape province. We believe that this
project demonstrates the potential for CDM projects to promote
local sustainable development whilst at the same time reducing
greenhouse gas emissions.
Our Designated National Authority (DNA) has to date received 16
project proposals submitted for review in areas like landfill gas,
hydro-electric, fuel switching and industrial energy efficiency. Of
these, five are at an advanced stage and will be submitted to the
CDM Executive Board before the end of this year. If implemented,
these projects will be equivalent to a reduction in CO2 emissions
of more than nine million tons per year, and will contribute more
than $253 million to the South African economy. These CDM projects
have crediting periods until at least 2015 - some even extend until
2026, which make a longer time horizon for the carbon market so
critical
Lessons Already Learnt - CDM Challenges
As a developing African country, our experience of the CDM has not
been unproblematic. In particular, we believe that there is an
urgent need to address issues like the fact that the CDM market is
relatively small and inhibited because of its limited life-span.
There is a critical imperative to ensure the continuation of the
CDM beyond 2012, including deeper emission cuts for Annex I
Parties. Without these, there will be very limited demand for
Certified Emission Reductions (CERs). Markets need clear
expectations of future value, and the current life-span does not
provide sufficient certainty to markets and investors, especially
as an incentive for large, capital intensive project
financing.
The current regulatory complexity also discourages investors and
need to be streamlined. Simplifying, consolidating and improving
baseline methodologies, like standard 'benchmarks' for specified
technologies, and devising new methodological options will build on
the work already done by the Executive Board.
It has also been our experience that pre-implementation
'transaction' costs for CDM projects impact negatively on business
involvement in CDM projects, for example smaller energy efficiency
and renewable energy projects. Reducing or exempting registration
fees and other transaction costs for small projects, and ensuring
clear and fast approval processes through the DNA's may assist the
process and give business a greater incentive to drive technology
diffusion.
It is also important to note that the various discussions we will
be holding under the UNFCCC to accelerate technology development
and its transfer on preferential terms will facilitate the
development of effective and sustainable CDM projects. In this
regard, there is also a need for better dissemination of
information and technology options, in other words,
information-sharing by governments, industries and public
utilities. This is true for developing countries' access to the
developed country investor community and likewise for developed
countries' access to information on CDM opportunities in developing
nations.
In conclusion, the CDM is established as a critical component of
the Kyoto architecture. We know that the deliberations at this COP
MOP1 will open the discussions about both the second commitment
period under the Kyoto Protocol for developed countries and a
strengthened multilateral climate change regime under the
Convention which should focus on strong actions to address climate
change in developing countries.
South Africa believes that within these discussions it is crucial
for the CDM to remain an important element of this architecture -
which, in turn depends on deeper cuts in greenhouse gas emissions
beyond 2012 in Annex 1 countries, global emissions trading, and
technology transfer programmes. With its dual goals of reducing GHG
emissions and promoting local sustainable development, the CDM has
great potential to bridge both the technology gap and the
investment gap. Success in these endeavours will mean, amongst
other things, that the issues of intellectual property rights and
the need for developed countries to take a more decisive lead in
funding and capacity building, must take centre-stage in our
deliberations.
South Africa stands ready to do more, as do almost all developing
nations. To do so, we will need multilateral incentives and
implementation beyond rhetoric, and within the framework of a new
two track paradigm of multilateral action beyond 2012.
Enquiries: Riaan Aucamp
Cell: 083 778 9923
Issued by: Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism
06 December 2005