“South Africa’s townships contribute up to R100-billion to the overall economy,” the chief executive of business advisory service EntBanc wrote in a LinkedIn post in May.
Vuyo Tofile was promoting the Township Investment Summit, held at the Soweto Theatre in June 2018.
He said the figure came from the World Bank and told Africa Check that he specifically meant the townships’ contribution to South Africa’s gross domestic product.
Tofile said his source was “a snippet” from the Gauteng Department of Economic Development. (Note: We asked the department for comment, which had not been received at the time of publication.)
No mention of R100-billion in World Bank study
A Google search brought up a Gauteng Department of Economic Development strategy draft called Revitalisation of the Township Economy. It reads: “According to the World Bank Study on South African townships, their combined economy is estimated at R100-billion.”
But the World Bank report, Economics of South African Townships, does not mention a figure of R100-billion anywhere.
The authors of the report, which was published in 2014, researched the economic conditions and types of businesses in Diepsloot, a large township in the north of Johannesburg. (Note: In South Africa, “township” usually refers to underdeveloped residential areas reserved for African, coloured and Indian people during apartheid.)
The report places the equivalent of gross domestic product for Diepsloot at R671-million, using 2012 figures.
How is gross domestic product measured?
A country’s gross domestic product (GDP) is a measure of the size of its economy. It is the value of all goods and services produced in a country in a period of time.
Any economic activity, such as building a house or paying for a haircut, increases GDP. What counts is economic activity that is recorded: unpaid work or illegal trade, for example, are not included in GDP because their value is unknown. Washing your car does not add to GDP, but paying a carwash to do the job does.
Statistics South Africa estimated the country’s GDP at the end of 2017 to be R3.1-trillion – at constant 2010 prices; the GDP figure at current prices, distorted by inflation, would not accurately represent growth – so R100-billion would be just over 3% of that total.
GDP isn’t that straightforward…
There are many problems with the concept of GDP, and how it is measured. For example, measuring the value of all goods and services produced is difficult.
GDP is also an imperfect measure. It doesn’t include the social costs of production. As GDP focuses on production, one of the things it doesn’t measure is the damage producing goods and services does to the natural environment.
It also does not adequately account for changes in the economy. GDP is adjusted for inflation, but the different price of smartphones 10 years ago and smartphones today is not only because prices have gone up, but also because today’s phones are much improved and more powerful.
All this means that GDP is not a particularly precise measurement and in fact GDP numbers are regularly revised. For example, the reported 2.2% decrease in South Africa’s GDP in the first three months of 2018 might still be changed.
Little of what is spent in township generated there
Rob Davies, one of the authors of the World Bank report, told Africa Check that no extrapolation for the economy as a whole was made on the basis of the Diepsloot study. In other words, we can’t say that what’s true in Diepsloot is true in all other townships.
To calculate a figure for all South African townships from the one case study, you “would be assuming that Diepsloot is the average (mean) township”, he explained.
“South Africa’s GDP is roughly R3-trillion. So the claim that townships generate R100-billion is, on the face of it, very modest. But I think our study showed that very little of what is spent in Diepsloot is generated there.”
In GDP terms, R100-billion is a small amount – only about 3% of South Africa’s total GDP, as we have seen.
“So I would not react strongly against such a claim – and I would take the rounded number of R100-billion – as a signal that this is intended as a rough ballpark figure,” Davies said.
Informal economies are difficult to measure
Alex Montgomery, a data analyst at DataFirst, told Africa Check it might be useful to find out how much townships contribute to South Africa’s economy.
But he said there would be a risk of errors because of the difference in measuring formal and informal economic activities.
“Measuring informal sector output is notoriously difficult,” he said.
Conclusion: R100-billion is not a World Bank figure, and no data confirms that townships contribute that amount to SA’s economy
In promoting the Township Investment Summit in Soweto, EntBanc chief executive Vuyo Tofile said South African townships contribute up to R100-billion to the overall economy.
Tofile’s source, a Gauteng Department of Economic Development document, said the figure of R100-billion came from the World Bank. The World Bank study of South African townships focused on one, Diepsloot. The study did not mention R100-billion anywhere.
One of the study’s authors said he wouldn’t strongly reject R100-billion as a rough ballpark figure.
But the informal economies found in townships are difficult to measure. So there would be a risk of errors in any attempt to set a value for the townships’ contribution to the total economy.
We therefore rate the claim as unproven.
Researched by Markus Korhonen, Africa Check, a non-partisan fact-checking organisation. View the original piece on their website