https://www.polity.org.za
Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
Home / Statements RSS ← Back
Close

Email this article

separate emails by commas, maximum limit of 4 addresses

Sponsored by

Close

Embed Video

SA: Joint statement by civil society, calls for real Arms Deal accountability (29/09/2014)

SA: Joint statement by civil society, calls for real Arms Deal accountability (29/09/2014)

29th September 2014

SAVE THIS ARTICLE      EMAIL THIS ARTICLE

Font size: -+

/ MEDIA STATEMENT / The content on this page is not written by Polity.org.za, but is supplied by third parties. This content does not constitute news reporting by Polity.org.za.

The 1999 Arms Deal represents up to R70 billion that should have been spent on housing, education, health and South Africa’s other pressing social needs. The Arms Deal corrupted our politics, weakened state institutions, and undermined our democracy. And despite mounting evidence of corruption, there has never been a full and transparent investigation. The politicians, public servants, middlemen, and large multinational arms companies involved have never been made to explain themselves to the South African people.

The Seriti Commission of Inquiry into the Arms Deal represented a crucial opportunity to uncover the truth, but it has become highly unlikely that the Commission will fulfil its mandate.

Advertisement

We, the undersigned organisations, join the call for the Commission to be dissolved.

Our concerns come from the following difficulties:

Advertisement

1. Refusal to allow access to documents
The Commission has refused to make huge amounts of evidence public. This includes thousands of documents from the official investigations of corruption by South African law enforcement,  which the Commission does not even appear to be using to inform or guide its own work. (A summary of evidence that the Commission has not released is here <http://armsdealfacts.com/list-of-evidence-withheld/> .)

2. Refusal to admit documents
The Commission has declared some of the most crucial documents pointing to corruption to be “inadmissible”. This includes a report prepared by a law firm for one of the arms companies, which details its own role in corruption and bribery in the Arms Deal. (The report, known as the Debevoise & Plimpton report, is available at www.armsdealfacts.com/evidence-of-corruption <http://www.armsdealfacts.com/evidence-of-corruption> )

3. Rulings that have hamstrung independent witnesses
The Commission has made a ruling that prevents witnesses from presenting secondary evidence; witnesses may only speak to documents that they have authored. Witnesses are also precluded from referring to any information that is not within their own personal knowledge. This means that only those with direct personal knowledge of corruption in the Arms Deal – effectively those who were party to it – would be in a position to give evidence of that corruption. (Read the witnesses' statement here <http://www.lhr.org.za/news/2014/media-statement-withdrawal-arms-procurement-commission> .)

4. Failure to call witnesses
The Commission has failed to call witnesses from the arms companies, from the list of known or suspected middlemen, or from any of the foreign law enforcement agencies that have investigated parts of the Arms Deal. Only two people of the dozens who have been directly implicated in impropriety have been called to testify. Only one member of the official law enforcement investigations, which were later dismantled, is due to testify.

5. Failure to gain the public’s trust
Since January 2013 there have been at least six senior resignations from the Commission staff, at least four of whom resigned in protest at the Commission’s conduct. In August 2014, two senior evidence leaders resigned from the Commission, saying its approach “nullifies the very purpose for which the commission was set up <http://mg.co.za/article/2014-08-07-arms-deal-letter-bomb> ”.

For these reasons, we have lost faith in the Seriti Commission’s capacity to reveal the truth behind the Arms Deal. It has lost its legitimacy in the eyes of the public.

We therefore add our voice to these demands:
Dissolve the Arms Procurement Commission.

Launch a full and transparent criminal investigation.

Prosecute all implicated in wrongdoing.
We note that the Commission has issued new subpoenas to whistleblowers Hennie van Vuuren, Andrew Feinstein and Paul Holden, who have withdrawn from the Commission due to its conduct. This would force them to participate under conditions that are manifestly unfair and one-sided.

We will not give up the fight for Arms Deal truth and justice!

Issued by R2K

EMAIL THIS ARTICLE      SAVE THIS ARTICLE

To subscribe email subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za or click here
To advertise email advertising@creamermedia.co.za or click here

Comment Guidelines

 

About

Polity.org.za is a product of Creamer Media.
www.creamermedia.co.za

Other Creamer Media Products include:
Engineering News
Mining Weekly
Research Channel Africa

Read more

Subscriptions

We offer a variety of subscriptions to our Magazine, Website, PDF Reports and our photo library.

Subscriptions are available via the Creamer Media Store.

View store

Advertise

Advertising on Polity.org.za is an effective way to build and consolidate a company's profile among clients and prospective clients. Email advertising@creamermedia.co.za

View options
Free daily email newsletter Register Now