http://www.polity.org.za
Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
Home / Statements RSS ← Back
Africa|Parliamentary Communication Services|Africa|South Africa|Sudan|United States|Services|Omar Al-Bashir|Siphosezwe Masango
Africa||Africa||Services|
africa-company|parliamentary-communication-services-company|africa|south-africa|sudan|united-states|services|omar-albashir|siphosezwe-masango
Close

Email this article

separate emails by commas, maximum limit of 4 addresses

Verification Image. Please refresh the page if you cannot see this image.

Sponsored by

Close

Article Enquiry

SA: International Relations Portfolio Committee notes ICC ruling

Verification Image. Please refresh the page if you cannot see this image.
Close

Embed Video

SA: International Relations Portfolio Committee notes ICC ruling

Photo by Reuters
Sudanese President Omar Al-Bashir

6th July 2017

SAVE THIS ARTICLE      EMAIL THIS ARTICLE

Font size: -+

The Portfolio Committee on International Relations and Cooperation has noted the ruling of the International Criminal Court (ICC) on the matter involving the South African government and President Omar Al-Bashir of Sudan.

The Chairperson of the Committee, Mr Siphosezwe Masango, said we should remember that President Al-Bashir did not visit South Africa on an invitation from government, but was attending an African Union summit. He therefore enjoyed immunity like any other head of state.

Advertisement

“President Al-Bashir was in the country attending an African Union summit of heads of state, and the principles of diplomatic immunity applied. The Committee remains convinced that South Africa acted in the best interests of African states and her people by not arresting a sitting head of state,” Mr Masango said.

“Diplomatic immunity impresses upon nations respect and absolute freedom for heads of states when visiting countries on international missions. South Africa ought to have been treated like the United Nations where presidents attend important meetings in the United States and cannot be arrested while on those assignments,” he said.

Advertisement

The ICC found that South Africa should have arrested President Al-Bashir in 2015 when he visited the country. The ICC Supreme Court of Appeals also upheld that the South African government ought to have arrested President Al-Bashir, in compliance with the arrest warrant that was issued by the North Gauteng High Court.

“If this ruling is insistent that South Africa ought to have arrested the president of Sudan, then that is justification enough for the South African government to leave the ICC as a matter of urgency,” he said.

 

Issued by Parliamentary Communication Services on behalf of the Chairperson of the Committee, Mr Siphosezwe Masango

EMAIL THIS ARTICLE      SAVE THIS ARTICLE ARTICLE ENQUIRY

To subscribe email subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za or click here
To advertise email advertising@creamermedia.co.za or click here

Comment Guidelines

About

Polity.org.za is a product of Creamer Media.
www.creamermedia.co.za

Other Creamer Media Products include:
Engineering News
Mining Weekly
Research Channel Africa

Read more

Subscriptions

We offer a variety of subscriptions to our Magazine, Website, PDF Reports and our photo library.

Subscriptions are available via the Creamer Media Store.

View store

Advertise

Advertising on Polity.org.za is an effective way to build and consolidate a company's profile among clients and prospective clients. Email advertising@creamermedia.co.za

View options
Free daily email newsletter Register Now