https://www.polity.org.za
Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
Home / News / All News RSS ← Back
Close

Email this article

separate emails by commas, maximum limit of 4 addresses

Sponsored by

Close

Embed Video

3

New nuclear storm as Westinghouse seeks legal review of R4.3bn Koeberg contract

New nuclear storm as Westinghouse seeks legal review of R4.3bn Koeberg contract
Photo by Duane Daws

29th September 2014

By: Terence Creamer
Creamer Media Editor

SAVE THIS ARTICLE      EMAIL THIS ARTICLE

Font size: -+

Toshiba’s Westinghouse Electric Company on Monday launched an expedited review application in the South Gauteng High Court challenging Eskom’s decision to award a R4.3-billion contract to Areva, of France, for the replacement of steam generators at the Koeberg nuclear power station, in Cape Town.

Westinghouse, which won an order on September 5 to secure documentation from Eskom relating to the basis of its decision to award the tender to Areva, continued to argue that the contract award was “flawed on various levels and should be set aside by the court”.

Advertisement

The company was also continuing with its attempts to secure outstanding documentation from Eskom, which it claimed the State-owned utility had failed to provide, notwitstanding an instruction stipulating that the documents be handed over within five calendar days of the court order.

Also on September 5, Eskom signed the disputed contract with Areva for the manufacture of six new steam generators, which Eskom planned to install at Koeberg in 2018. The 2018 installation schedule coincides with maintenance activities planned for the facility.

Advertisement

Eskom acting group executive for technology and commercial Matshela Koko stated at the time that the utility saw no impediment to signing the contract with Areva, arguing that Westinghouse had never been identified as the preferred bidder throughout the tender process, which began in 2011.

He also gave assurances that there had been no discrepancies between the recommendation of a 25-person-strong technical team set up for the contract and the recommendations of the executive procurement committee and the board subcommittee, which made the final procurement decision.

Allegations that acting CEO Collin Matjila and Public Enterprises Minister Lynne Brown reversed the board subcommittee's decision in favour of Areva were also denied.

Based on documentation that Eskom had provided, however, Westinghouse maintained that there had been “fundamental breaches of Eskom's obligations to administer a fair and transparent tender process”.

In its latest press statement, the company argued that, while Eskom had well-documented procurement processes, “these processes were departed from to take into account certain ‘strategic issues’, which allegedly favoured Areva”.

It added that these issues were never part of the evaluation criteria and Westinghouse was, thus, not given an opportunity to comment in line with a fair and transparent tender process.

ROSATOM FALLOUT

News of the court action came as South Africa’s Department of Energy (DoE) continued with a damage-control exercise following an announcement that an agreement had been signed with Rosatom for new nuclear power plants incorporating Russian VVER reactors.

In a statement released on September 27, the DoE indicated that the ‘Inter-Governmental Agreement regarding Nuclear Energy Co-operation between South Africa and Russia’ was but one of “over 60” co-operation agreements signed by the South African government “addressing different aspects of energy and usage of different energy sources”.

It also stressed that the “process of engaging with the thrust of the agreement with the Russian Federation, as represented by Rosatom, and the South African government, as represented by the DoE, will be subjected to the normal process of internal government and legislative scrutiny, and obviously, the public, the media, civil society and political parties will have an opportunity, through such processes, to fully comprehend the full details of the agreement”.

“The Department of Energy wish[es] to assure all South Africans and interested parties that nothing will be withheld from them with respect to this agreement, as in the case with all other agreements previously entered between our government and other governments. We however do appeal that the necessary due process, as stipulated in our country's statutes (laws and policies) be allowed to run their normal course,” the statement concluded.

EMAIL THIS ARTICLE      SAVE THIS ARTICLE

To subscribe email subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za or click here
To advertise email advertising@creamermedia.co.za or click here

Comment Guidelines

About

Polity.org.za is a product of Creamer Media.
www.creamermedia.co.za

Other Creamer Media Products include:
Engineering News
Mining Weekly
Research Channel Africa

Read more

Subscriptions

We offer a variety of subscriptions to our Magazine, Website, PDF Reports and our photo library.

Subscriptions are available via the Creamer Media Store.

View store

Advertise

Advertising on Polity.org.za is an effective way to build and consolidate a company's profile among clients and prospective clients. Email advertising@creamermedia.co.za

View options
Free daily email newsletter Register Now