We have detected that the browser you are using is no longer supported. As a result, some content may not display correctly.
We suggest that you upgrade to the latest version of any of the following browsers:
close notification
Date
: 08/10/2003
Source: South African Revenue Service (SARS)
Title: Manuel: World Customs Organisation 2003 IT Conference and
Exhibition dinner reception
ADDRESS BY THE SOUTH AFRICAN MINISTER OF FINANCE, MR TREVOR MANUEL,
MP: WORLD CUSTOMS ORGANISATION (WCO) 2003 IT CONFERENCE AND
EXHIBITION DINNER RECEPTION, 8 October 2003
Commissioner Gordhan
Secretary-General Danet
Directors-General of Customs
Ladies and Gentlemen
Welcome to South Africa - It is my pleasure to be with you this
evening on the first day of the WCO 2003 IT Conference and
Exhibition.
It is heartening to note that the Conference is focused on
Information Technology in Africa and that you have adopted the
theme of using Information Technology as a catalyst for
development.
Information Technology is one of the main drivers of globalisation.
Joseph Stiglitz, the former chief economist of the World Bank
described globalisation as the removal of barriers to the movement
of goods, capital, labour, IT and telecommunications.
Globalisation is bringing about increased economic and political
integration. The reality, however, is that the same processes that
are bringing us all together in a global village are placing the
residents of the global village in different positions. Some have
emerged as the dominant and others as the dominated, with the
dominant being the decision-makers and the dominated being the
recipients and implementers of these decisions. This situation
necessitates the development of institutions of governance that
work in the interest of all the peoples of the world.
South Africa and a number of other developed and developing
countries have accordingly strongly advocated for a strong,
effective and popularly accepted United Nations. Recent dramatic
events have threatened the future of the United Nations as a strong
international organisation. We are faced with the choice of
establishing a strong multi-polar international system that focuses
on the interests of all its constituencies or a uni-polar world
where the law of the jungle prevails.
At the same time, we must proceed from the position that the
distribution of international power is not in the interest of all
the players. Depending on the place we occupy in the world, we have
different priorities. The rich are concerned about maintaining the
status quo and the poor are interested in changing their condition
for the better.
Over the past few years a number of new international agreements
were reached that reflect a renewed awareness of the difficulties
faced by the global community in combating poverty. The Monterrey
Consensus and the adoption of the Millennium Development Goals were
landmark achievements.
In recognition of the role of trade as an engine of economic
growth, the World Trade Organisation also launched a new round of
trade negotiations in 2001 in Doha. The Doha Development Round was
widely acknowledged as a step in the right direction to correct the
imbalances that currently pervade the international trading
system.
The failure in Cancun to broker an agreement on the mandate for the
next round of trade negotiations has thrown into disarray the
immediate future of the multilateral trading system. To be sure,
something happened in Cancun. But what it is and what it means for
the world trading system is yet to be fully comprehended.
The Cancun meeting is the latest in a trend of failed WTO
negotiations, the most spectacular being the fiasco in Seattle in
1999. In many ways the seeds of failure were laid in the outcome of
the Uruguay Round, which started in 1986 and ended in 1993. At the
heart of the Uruguay Round outcome was a structured imbalance in
the benefits derived by the rich and poorer countries
respectively.
Cancun saw the manifestation of a strategic realignment of power
within the WTO. The emergence of the Group of 20+ significantly
strengthened the bargaining power of developing countries. The
result was an important moral and political victory, which sought
to constrain the dominance of the powerful countries. Despite the
gains, it must be recognised that this was at best a defensive
victory. By itself, the collapse of the talks does not advance the
interest of developing countries. It merely points to the need for
change in the terms of engagement.
The challenge is to ensure that the multilateral system in all its
various dimensions continue to enjoy the confidence of the peoples
of the world and is capable of addressing matters of concern to all
humanity. We need to maintain vigilance in regard to prospects for
increasing bilateralism and the risk that such developments may
effectively marginalise developing countries.
Our central challenge on the African continent is the eradication
of poverty and under-development. The New Partnership for Africa's
Development was adopted by the African Heads of State and sets out
the vision and strategic framework for the successful economic
development of Africa, characterised by high standards of living,
thriving private sectors and accountable and democratic states. As
an economic programme, NEPAD not only addresses Africa's economic
problems but also the marginalisation of African countries on the
international stage.
One of the priority sectors of NEPAD is the ICT sector. NEPAD
recognises the importance of ICT in enabling the recovery of Africa
and to facilitate our competitive entry into the world economy. The
challenge for African customs administrations is to develop
measures to support the NEPAD objectives and specifically through
the use of ICT. The WCO 2003 IT Conference and Exhibition is a
landmark as it enables Customs administrations from Africa and
other developing countries to share information and to develop
strategies to optimise the use of ICT in their
administrations.
As Africans we must take these challenges very, very seriously. We
must understand that trade facilitation is going to be an important
leg of development going forward. We must understand that trade
facilitation is dependent almost exclusively on the sound and
efficient customs systems between countries. We must do so in an
environment where we all take responsibility for ensuring that as
we proceed in a world premised on primarily on free trade that
customs as a generator of revenue for government is going to be
less and less important, that customs as a facilitator of trade
will become increasingly more important.
We must understand that the role of customs is to ensure that goods
survive and that contrabands are outvoted. We have a collective
responsibility to ensure that economic development is premised on
sound clear rules and efficient administration to develop rules in
the interest of all people but focussing especially on the poorest
people of the world. It's critical therefore that customs
administrations are dynamic and efficient to support the
realisation of NEPAD and national developmental objectives. Customs
administrations have to provide strategic functions on behalf of
their governments. But the key focus has to be on trade
facilitation.
ICT is not a stand-alone. It is a measure to ensure that we can
facilitate trade better. We have the most promising opportunities
because member states on the African continent are as passionate as
they are about NEPAD. And because ITC is an important part of NEPAD
and because NEPAD is focused on economic development, if we pull
all these together and I think we ask of our customs
administrations, our directors-generals gathered here, seize the
moment, carpe diem, let's take the issues forward, we have
everything to gain.
I thank you.
ENDS.
For further information, please contact Adrian Lackay on 083 388
2580.