http://www.polity.org.za
Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
Home / Opinion / Real Economy RSS ← Back
Africa|Business|Business Leadership South Africa|Denel|Eskom|PROJECT|rail|South African Airways|Africa|South Africa|Media Scrutiny|Cyril Ramaphosa|Mark Lamberti|Regulatory Clearing Account|Regulatory Clearing Account Application|South Africa
Africa|Business|Denel|Eskom|PROJECT|rail||Africa|||||
africa-company|business|business-leadership-south-africa|denel|eskom|project|rail|south-african-airways|africa|south-africa|media-scrutiny|cyril-ramaphosa|mark-lamberti|regulatory-clearing-account|regulatory-clearing-account-application|south-africa-region
Close

Email this article

separate emails by commas, maximum limit of 4 addresses

Verification Image. Please refresh the page if you cannot see this image.

Sponsored by

Close

Article Enquiry

Fighting chance

Verification Image. Please refresh the page if you cannot see this image.
Close

Embed Video

Fighting chance

27th April 2018

By: Terence Creamer
Creamer Media Editor

SAVE THIS ARTICLE      EMAIL THIS ARTICLE

Font size: -+

The new, credible boards appointed at South Africa’s largest and most troubled State-owned companies (SoCs) – Denel, Eskom, the Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa and South African Airways – must be given every opportunity to succeed. If they fail, the consequences for the country’s fiscal sustainability, as well as efforts to convert higher business confidence into what President Cyril Ramaphosa believes could be $100-billion worth of real investment, will be dire.

That’s not to say public and media scrutiny should be reduced or weakened. Not at all! The proposition that ‘sunlight is the best disinfectant’, as outlined in FutureGrowth’s recent assessment of what went wrong at SoCs during the recent past, is entirely correct.

Advertisement

It is also completely correct for nonexecutive and executive directors appointed during this ‘new-dawn’ period to be held to a higher standard. Therefore, Mark Lamberti’s resignation from the Eskom and Business Leadership South Africa boards, as well as Imperial CEO, following an adverse High Court judgment, should be applauded, even if the accompanying attacks on him and his corporate contribution were unfair and misinformed.

Nevertheless, it is entirely counterproductive for South Africans to continue to apply the oppositional framework – used so effectively during the recent period, when SoC boards were undoubtedly instrumental in an unscrupulous project to direct commercial benefit the way of a politically connected elite – to these new boards and to the nonexecutives and executives appointed to them.

Advertisement

Without question, these individuals are going to have to make some extremely difficult trade-offs in order to correct problems they have had no personal role in creating. As with all trade-offs, there will be losers, because balancing contradictory imperatives is hardly ever possible in the real world, despite what some populist commentators would have us believe.

What’s more, these individuals have taken on this responsibility in the knowledge that being a board member of an SoC poses a genuine reputational risk, as has already been seen in the Lamberti case.

Therefore, it is only fair that we as citizens give them a fighting chance for success. In other words, these boards should not be tarred with the State-capture brush when they begin taking action, which some are likely to find ideologically unpalatable and others will view as a capitulation to ongoing inefficiency.

This is easier said than done, as is already evident in the current hostility towards Eskom’s Regulatory Clearing Account application and in the fractious debate about whether or not South African Airways should be placed into business rescue, rather than allow the new leadership to attempt another turnaround.

What is arguably becoming clear is that, for these new boards to be truly effective, they are going to have to make uncomfortable decisions in the interest of both corporate sustainability and the country’s best long-term interest.

Given the circumstances, the right decisions are unlikely to be popular decisions. It’s up to the corporate and political leadership to ensure that the trade-offs are well explained so as to ensure buy-in or, at the very least, a grudging acceptance. Such an outcome would be impossible if there is no acknowledgement that there has been a change not only in the make-up of the boards but also in the credibility and integrity of those appointed to them.

EMAIL THIS ARTICLE      SAVE THIS ARTICLE ARTICLE ENQUIRY

To subscribe email subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za or click here
To advertise email advertising@creamermedia.co.za or click here

Comment Guidelines

About

Polity.org.za is a product of Creamer Media.
www.creamermedia.co.za

Other Creamer Media Products include:
Engineering News
Mining Weekly
Research Channel Africa

Read more

Subscriptions

We offer a variety of subscriptions to our Magazine, Website, PDF Reports and our photo library.

Subscriptions are available via the Creamer Media Store.

View store

Advertise

Advertising on Polity.org.za is an effective way to build and consolidate a company's profile among clients and prospective clients. Email advertising@creamermedia.co.za

View options
Free daily email newsletter Register Now