http://www.polity.org.za
Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
Home / Press Office / Labour Law Management Consulting RSS ← Back
Expertise|Consulting|Defence|Labour Law Management Consulting|Law Advice|Law Expert|Ivan Israelstam
Expertise|Consulting|Defence|||
expertise|consulting-company|defence|labour-law-management-consulting|law-advice|law-expert|ivan-israelstam
Close

Email this article

separate emails by commas, maximum limit of 4 addresses

Verification Image. Please refresh the page if you cannot see this image.

Sponsored by

Close

Article Enquiry

Employees Have The Right To Prepare For Disciplinary Hearings

Verification Image. Please refresh the page if you cannot see this image.
Close

Embed Video

Employees Have The Right To Prepare For Disciplinary Hearings

30th October 2018

SAVE THIS ARTICLE      EMAIL THIS ARTICLE

Font size: -+

Employees facing disciplinary hearings are entitled to many rights including that of the proper opportunity to prepare for the hearing in advance. This right stems from the more basic right that accused employees have to defend themselves against the charges brought.

The employee’s right to sufficient opportunity to prepare has three facets:

Advertisement
  • The right to sufficient time to prepare a defence: The rule of thumb is that preparation time should be at least one full working day. However, depending on the number and complexity of charges and on obstacles that may exist, this preparation period may need to be extended within reason.
  • The right to fully understand the charges: Charges such as ‘dishonesty’ or ‘fraud’ are far too vague. Sufficient details are to be given to the employee to make preparation realistically possible.
  • The right to documentation: The employer should provide the accused with the documents it intends to use in the hearing as well as other relevant documents requested by the employee.

In the case of Oliver vs Universiteit van Stellenbosch (Contemporary Labour Law Vol. 14 No. 9 April 2005) a forensic investigation report implicated Oliver in certain irregularities. Six days before the hearing was due to begin the employee requested documents he needed for the hearing and requested that the hearing be postponed. These requests were refused.

As a result the employee applied to the High Court for an order requiring the employer to provide the requested documentation and further particulars of the charges. The Court ruled that:

Advertisement
  • The employee had not been given sufficient time to prepare and the university’s decision not to postpone was wrong
  • It was presumptuous of the employer to decide what documents the employee would need.
  • The employer had not argued that the requested documents were irrelevant, confidential or unavailable
  • The charges against the employee were vague
  • The employer was to provide the documents and the further particulars required by the employee.

This decision acts as a warning to employers in that:

  • The employee’s right to prepare for a disciplinary hearing is sacrosanct.
  • Withholding documents needlessly from the accused employee serves no useful purpose. Where the requested documents are confidential and/or irrelevant to the disciplinary charges the employer requires expert labour law advice on how to withhold such documents in a way that does not infringe the law.
  • Formulating charges that are general or vague will not assist the employer’s cause, but will instead, be seen to be unfair. Formulating charges clearly, legally and in a manner useful both to the employee and to the employer is very difficult. This should not be done without the assistance of a labour law expert.

Employers are also reminded that, where the employee is allowed external legal representation at the disciplinary hearing, the employer needs to be sure that the official acting as complainant (initiator or prosecutor) and the person chairing the hearing both have the legal expertise necessary to cope with the expertise of the employee’s attorney, advocate or union official.

Written by Ivan Israelstam, Chief Executive of Labour Law Management Consulting. He may be contacted on 0828522973 or on e-mail address: ivan@labourlawadvice.co.za.

EMAIL THIS ARTICLE      SAVE THIS ARTICLE ARTICLE ENQUIRY

To subscribe email subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za or click here
To advertise email advertising@creamermedia.co.za or click here

Comment Guidelines

About

Polity.org.za is a product of Creamer Media.
www.creamermedia.co.za

Other Creamer Media Products include:
Engineering News
Mining Weekly
Research Channel Africa

Read more

Subscriptions

We offer a variety of subscriptions to our Magazine, Website, PDF Reports and our photo library.

Subscriptions are available via the Creamer Media Store.

View store

Advertise

Advertising on Polity.org.za is an effective way to build and consolidate a company's profile among clients and prospective clients. Email advertising@creamermedia.co.za

View options
Free daily email newsletter Register Now
Register Close