https://www.polity.org.za
Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
Home / Statements RSS ← Back
Close

Email this article

separate emails by commas, maximum limit of 4 addresses

Sponsored by

Close

Embed Video

DA: Statement by Mmusi Maimane, Democratic Alliance Parliamentary Leader, SIU Report: Nkandla architect to pay but what about Zuma? (12/09/2014)

Mmusi Maimane
Photo by DA
Mmusi Maimane

12th September 2014

SAVE THIS ARTICLE      EMAIL THIS ARTICLE

Font size: -+

/ MEDIA STATEMENT / The content on this page is not written by Polity.org.za, but is supplied by third parties. This content does not constitute news reporting by Polity.org.za.

The Democratic Alliance notes that the Special Investigating Unit (SIU) Report into Nkandla was yesterday submitted to Parliament. However, we are concerned that the SIU investigation commissioned by President Jacob Zuma appears to lay blame with the architect, Mr Minenhle Makhanya, who is said to be liable for R155 million.

While Mr Makhanya may be liable for inflating certain costs, the Public Protector’s Secure in Comfort report cannot be ignored in favour of the SIU’s report. The Public Protector found that President Zuma improperly and unduly benefited from the Nkandla upgrades and ordered him personally to pay “a reasonable percentage of the cost”. This remedial action is only capable of being varied by a review application in court.

Advertisement

The SIU report expressly states that “The President did not request the security upgrade.” Be this as it may, the report found that “The President or his family were enriched” from the non-security upgrades. When considered with the Public Protector’s finding that the President was on various occasions briefed on the upgrades, both non-security and security related, informally and formally, it is clear that the President was fully aware of what was happening at his private residence, and how much was accruing to him privately. The President cannot pretend to be a 'victim of generosity'.

The work of the Nkandla Ad Hoc Committee, which is tasked by Parliament to hold all accountable for the R246 million undue benefit at Nkandla, must in its deliberations consider all reports and their recommendations and remedial action steps. The Committee must identify inconsistencies between the various reports and ask those who drew them up to explain those inconsistencies.

Advertisement

The Democratic Alliance also notes that of all the investigations into the Nkandla security upgrades, the only independent report is that of the Public Protector. The veracity of the investigations undertaken by the SIU, Joint Standing Committee on Intelligence (JSCI) and the Inter-Ministerial Task Team are compromised as the investigators themselves report to the President, directly or indirectly, who is the subject of the investigations.

With all the reports made public, now is the time for accountability.

Issued by DA

EMAIL THIS ARTICLE      SAVE THIS ARTICLE

To subscribe email subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za or click here
To advertise email advertising@creamermedia.co.za or click here

Comment Guidelines

 

About

Polity.org.za is a product of Creamer Media.
www.creamermedia.co.za

Other Creamer Media Products include:
Engineering News
Mining Weekly
Research Channel Africa

Read more

Subscriptions

We offer a variety of subscriptions to our Magazine, Website, PDF Reports and our photo library.

Subscriptions are available via the Creamer Media Store.

View store

Advertise

Advertising on Polity.org.za is an effective way to build and consolidate a company's profile among clients and prospective clients. Email advertising@creamermedia.co.za

View options
Free daily email newsletter Register Now