https://www.polity.org.za
Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
Home / Statements RSS ← Back
Close

Email this article

separate emails by commas, maximum limit of 4 addresses

Sponsored by

Close

Embed Video

DA: Dianne Kohler Barnard on Hawks, says a court of law must rule

Anwa Dramat
Anwa Dramat

30th January 2015

SAVE THIS ARTICLE      EMAIL THIS ARTICLE

Font size: -+

/ MEDIA STATEMENT / The content on this page is not written by Polity.org.za, but is supplied by third parties. This content does not constitute news reporting by Polity.org.za.

The Portfolio Committee on Police today took a decision to refer the matter of the Minister of Police asking us to fire head of the Hawks, Anwa Dramat, to the Speaker’s office for clarity on how to proceed.

This is despite the fact that court processes around Dramat’s suspension are yet to reach a conclusion.

We have no doubt that the North Gauteng High Court will rule that General Dramat must return to work.  At the hearing of this matter today, the Minister’s lawyers arrived unprepared and will now only make their arguments on Monday morning.  The Helen Suzman Foundation lawyers presented their arguments.

Secondly, the appeal by the Minister to the finding that he had committed two illegal acts, in suspending Dramat and then appointing an acting Head, will be heard by the Constitutional Court on Thursday next week.

In the interim, there is no basis for Parliament to entertain any proceedings for Dramat’s removal from office until judicial processes have run their full course.

General Dramat has never been arrested, tried or convicted of any crime, yet is being accused of committing one. The Minister has provided no evidence that would warrant Parliament instituting any proceedings for Dramat’s removal from office.

Instead, it is clear to us that the Police Minister acted unlawfully and outside of his authority when he suspended the Hawks boss without basis and without consulting Parliament. He knows that the law is not on his side and is looking for Parliament to condone his conduct ex post facto.

Should the Constitutional Court confirm the illegality of the Minister’s actions, it will then be Parliament’s responsibility to review the Minister’s fitness for office.

The separation of powers is crucial to our democracy and the Minister’s undue political influence must not be tolerated by Parliament.

The Court’s must be allowed to complete their work before Parliament can assess how to proceed further on this matter.

 

Advertisement

Issued by DA

To watch Creamer Media's latest video reports, click here
 
Advertisement

EMAIL THIS ARTICLE      SAVE THIS ARTICLE

To subscribe email subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za or click here
To advertise email advertising@creamermedia.co.za or click here

Comment Guidelines

 

About

Polity.org.za is a product of Creamer Media.
www.creamermedia.co.za

Other Creamer Media Products include:
Engineering News
Mining Weekly
Research Channel Africa

Read more

Subscriptions

We offer a variety of subscriptions to our Magazine, Website, PDF Reports and our photo library.

Subscriptions are available via the Creamer Media Store.

View store

Advertise

Advertising on Polity.org.za is an effective way to build and consolidate a company's profile among clients and prospective clients. Email advertising@creamermedia.co.za

View options
Free daily email newsletter Register Now