https://www.polity.org.za
Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
Home / Statements RSS ← Back
Close

Email this article

separate emails by commas, maximum limit of 4 addresses

Sponsored by

Close

Embed Video

CW: Statement by the Corruption Watch, anti-corruption organisation, asserts that President Zuma is a key hurdle to fighting corruption (19/08/2014)

CW: Statement by the Corruption Watch, anti-corruption organisation, asserts that President Zuma is a key hurdle to fighting corruption (19/08/2014)

19th August 2014

SAVE THIS ARTICLE      EMAIL THIS ARTICLE

Font size: -+

/ MEDIA STATEMENT / The content on this page is not written by Polity.org.za, but is supplied by third parties. This content does not constitute news reporting by Polity.org.za.

President Zuma’s response to Parliament regarding the R200m upgrade is yet another demonstration of his disturbingly low commitment to fighting corruption in South Africa.

“While we don't think that history is made by individuals, President Zuma’s personal conduct has clearly become a major obstacle to fighting corruption,” said David Lewis, executive director of Corruption Watch.
“As long as President Zuma remains the president of the ANC and the leader of the government, the credibility of these vital institutions in fighting corruption will always be questionable,” added Lewis.

The incessant disregard of the office of the public protector as a chapter nine institution is a flagrant attack on the country’s democracy. It undermines the most basic principle of the Constitution by positioning highly placed individuals such as President Zuma above the law, allowing them to act with impunity to advance their own interests.

The key recommendation brought forward by the public protector’s Secure in Comfort report was that President Zuma asks the National Treasury and the SAPS to determine a reasonable cost of the non-security features – including the kraal, chicken run, pool and visitors’ centre – and that he pays back a reasonable percentage of the taxpayers’ money.
On the contrary, President Zuma designated the minister of police to decide whether or not he is liable for non-security costs acquired during the upgrades. The public protector’s report revealed that the same ministry improperly declared President

Zuma’s residence a National Key Point and subsequently failed to apply “better executive leadership”.
The government’s efforts to fighting corruption are likely to be futile and ineffective for as long as it continues to disregard the findings of a crucial anti-corruption body such as the public protector and to immunise powerful citizens from the provisions of the Constitution and the law.

Advertisement

EMAIL THIS ARTICLE      SAVE THIS ARTICLE

To subscribe email subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za or click here
To advertise email advertising@creamermedia.co.za or click here

Comment Guidelines

 

About

Polity.org.za is a product of Creamer Media.
www.creamermedia.co.za

Other Creamer Media Products include:
Engineering News
Mining Weekly
Research Channel Africa

Read more

Subscriptions

We offer a variety of subscriptions to our Magazine, Website, PDF Reports and our photo library.

Subscriptions are available via the Creamer Media Store.

View store

Advertise

Advertising on Polity.org.za is an effective way to build and consolidate a company's profile among clients and prospective clients. Email advertising@creamermedia.co.za

View options
Free daily email newsletter Register Now