Policy, Law, Economics and Politics - Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
This privately-owned website is operated and maintained by Creamer Media
We have detected that the browser you are using is no longer supported. As a result, some content may not display correctly.
We suggest that you upgrade to the latest version of any of the following browsers:
         
close notification
10 February 2012
   
 
 
Article by: Creamer Media Reporter
 
 
 
 
DOWNLOAD
Competition Commission v Telkom - 345 KB
 

Competition Act 89 of 1998 - s 3(1A)(a) - concurrent jurisdiction - telecommunications industry - review of complaint referral - bias - non-compliance with s 50(4)(a) concerning extension of time for complaint referral - memorandum of agreement between Commission and ICASA - s 82 Competition Act
Order:
On appeal from:The Pretoria High Court (RD Claassen J sitting as court of first instance)
The following order is made;
(1)The appeal is upheld with costs including the costs of two counsel;
(2)The cross-appeal is dismissed with costs including the costs of two counsel;
(3)The order of the court a quo is set aside and replaced with the following;
‘the application is dismissed with costs including the costs of two counsel.'

Edited by: Creamer Media Reporter
 
 
 
 
  Photos
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Advertisements:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Related social media
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Topics on this page
 
 
 
Company
 
Commission
Icasa
Industry Term
 
Telecommunications Industry
 
 
 
 
Sishen Iron Ore Company (Pty) Ltd v Minister of Mineral Resources and Others (28980/10) [2012] ZAGPPHC 2
 
 
North Gauteng High Court
Tarfix (Pty) Ltd v MEC, Department of Public Works and Rural Development, Free State Province and Another (3452/2010) [2012] ZAFSHC 7
 
 
Free State High Court
C and Others v Department of Health and Social Development, Gauteng and Others (CCT 55/11) [2012] ZACC 1
 
 
Constitutional Court
Bhushula v Ukhahlamba District Municipality (2200/09) [2012] ZAECGHC 1
 
 
Eastern Cape High Court
 
Slipknot Investments 777 (Pty) Ltd and Another v Eastern Cape Liquor Board and Others (EL 861/2011, ECD 1294/2011) [2011] ZAECELLC 17
 
 
Eastern Cape High Court
Eskom Holdings Ltd v National Union of Mineworkers and Others (840/2010) [2011] ZASCA 229
 
 
SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL
Equity Aviation Services (Pty) Ltd v South African Transport and Allied Workers Union and Others (478/09) [2011] ZASCA 232
 
 
SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL
Road Accident Fund v Lechner (711/10) [2011] ZASCA 240
 
 
SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL
 
Industrial Corporation of South Africa Ltd v PFE International Inc. (BVI) and Others (910/10) [2011] ZASCA 245
 
 
SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL
TEB Properties CC v MEC, Department of Health and Social Development, North West (792/10) [2011] ZASCA 243
 
 
SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL
Visser v Mopani District Municipality and Others (641/10) [2011] ZASCA 248
 
 
SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL
Rademan v Moqhaka Municipality and Others (173/11) [2011] ZASCA 244
 
 
SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL
 
 
 
case law page
 
 
more  
 
 
 
 
 
Online Publishers Association