Policy, Law, Economics and Politics - Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
This privately-owned website is operated and maintained by Creamer Media
We have detected that the browser you are using is no longer supported. As a result, some content may not display correctly.
We suggest that you upgrade to the latest version of any of the following browsers:
close notification
29 May 2017
Article by: Creamer Media Reporter
Embed Code Close
  Related social media
Related social media terms:

The Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) dismissed the appeal by the Chairperson of the National Council of Provinces against a decision of the Western Cape Division of the High Court, Cape Town, and accordingly upheld an order reviewing and setting aside certain rulings that she had made against Mr Julius Malema (the first respondent) while chairing a joint sitting of the National Assembly and the National Council of Provinces.

The issue before the SCA was whether the court a quo was correct in reviewing and setting aside as unlawful the Chairperson’s rulings during a parliamentary debate following the 2014 State of the Nation Address that: (i) Mr Malema’s statement that the African National Congress (ANC) government had ‘massacred the people in Marikana’ was unparliamentary; (ii) Mr Malema must withdraw that statement; and (iii) Mr Malema’s refusal to comply with her order to withdraw the statement amounted to contempt of her authority, justifying an order that he must leave the House.

Edited by: Creamer Media Reporter
Comment Guidelines (150 word limit)
  Topics on this page
Online Publishers Association