https://www.polity.org.za
Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
Home / Legal Briefs / Other Briefs RSS ← Back
Africa|Service
Africa|Service
africa|service
Close

Email this article

separate emails by commas, maximum limit of 4 addresses

Sponsored by

Close

Article Enquiry

Back to Basics: Administrative Authorities vs. Courts of Law

Close

Embed Video

Back to Basics: Administrative Authorities vs. Courts of Law

Back to Basics: Administrative Authorities vs. Courts of Law

26th November 2019

ARTICLE ENQUIRY      SAVE THIS ARTICLE      EMAIL THIS ARTICLE

Font size: -+

In April 2018, the Constitutional Court in South Africa (reference: 2018 (7) BCLR 830 (CC)) handed down a succinct judgment in which it held that an administrative authority’s interpretation of legislation is not persuasive authority without more.

On the question as to what extent a Court may consider or defer to an administrative authority’s interpretation of legislation, the Court responded that any Court’s interpretation must always be an objective and independent interpretation, which is expressed in the following principle:

Advertisement

When a legislative interpretation of an administrative authority is evidence of a consistent and impartial interpretation over a prolonged period by all those involved, then such administrative authority’s interpretation is persuasive authority that a Court may take into account when objectively and independently interpreting the meaning of legislation.

This judgment has far-reaching implications for, for example, the South African Revenue Service that issues Interpretation Notes, the Broad Based Black Economic Empowerment Commission that issues Guidelines, and the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa that issues Position Papers (collectively referred to as Interpretative Documents). 

Advertisement

First, an administrative authority cannot submit its Interpretative Document as persuasive authority in judicial proceedings, unless such Interpretative Document qualifies as evidence of a consistent and impartial interpretation over a prolonged period by all those involved.

Second and by necessary implication, an administrative authority (forming part of the executive authority) engulfed in litigation against a private citizen (inclusive of juristic entities) must, as the private citizen, convince a Court that its interpretation accords with, and is an accurate reflection of, the purpose of the legislation even if its interpretation qualifies as evidence, as set out above.

It is, therefore, important for legal practitioners, their clients, and regulators to remember that it is only the judicial authority (generally understood as the Courts) that can and must interpret the meaning of legislation.

Written By JJ Van der Walt, Associate, Baker McKenzie Johannesburg

 

EMAIL THIS ARTICLE      SAVE THIS ARTICLE ARTICLE ENQUIRY

To subscribe email subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za or click here
To advertise email advertising@creamermedia.co.za or click here

Comment Guidelines

About

Polity.org.za is a product of Creamer Media.
www.creamermedia.co.za

Other Creamer Media Products include:
Engineering News
Mining Weekly
Research Channel Africa

Read more

Subscriptions

We offer a variety of subscriptions to our Magazine, Website, PDF Reports and our photo library.

Subscriptions are available via the Creamer Media Store.

View store

Advertise

Advertising on Polity.org.za is an effective way to build and consolidate a company's profile among clients and prospective clients. Email advertising@creamermedia.co.za

View options
Free daily email newsletter Register Now