https://www.polity.org.za
Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
Home / Legal Briefs / Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr RSS ← Back
Close

Email this article

separate emails by commas, maximum limit of 4 addresses

Sponsored by

Close

Embed Video

Appeals to suspend environmental authorisations: A barrier to development or proper protection of the environment?

Appeals to suspend environmental authorisations: A barrier to development or proper protection of the environment?

18th September 2014

SAVE THIS ARTICLE      EMAIL THIS ARTICLE

Font size: -+

Environmental authorisations issued by the Department of Environmental Affairs will now be suspended if an appeal is submitted. This is in terms of an amendment to the National Environmental Management Act, (NEMA), which has been in place since 2 September. This amendment could have the unfortunate potential consequence of delaying much-needed developments.

This is particularly as appeals to environmental authorisations are often lodged without any basis, with appellants relying on minor environmental impacts and not balancing the socio-economic elements of sustainable development under NEMA's provisions.

Advertisement

However, prior to the amendment, the law required that where local communities or other interested and affected parties identified a serious environmental or socio-economic impact associated with a development, such parties were obliged to resort to the very costly route of instituting interdict proceedings in a High Court to stop the development, whilst they awaited the outcome of their appeal (and possibly also review proceedings if the appeal was dismissed). In the interim, whilst an appeal to an environmental authorisation was being considered by the competent authority, it was possible that significant environmental damage could result.

If interdict proceedings were not immediately instituted and the development had commenced, it was often difficult to obtain an interdict, as the party opposing it could not show that irreparable harm would be caused and the balance of convenience favoured them, which is necessary to prove in an interdict. If an interdict was not granted, the development generally proceeded and there was little value to the appeal, particularly given the long period generally taken by the authorities to finalise them. 

Advertisement

This amendment to NEMA also brings it in line with other environmental legislation, for example the National Water Act, No 36 of 1998, which also suspends a water use licence when an appeal is lodged.

Written by Sandra Gore, Director,  and Gareth Howard, Candidate Attorney, Environmental Department, Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr Inc.

EMAIL THIS ARTICLE      SAVE THIS ARTICLE

To subscribe email subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za or click here
To advertise email advertising@creamermedia.co.za or click here

Comment Guidelines

About

Polity.org.za is a product of Creamer Media.
www.creamermedia.co.za

Other Creamer Media Products include:
Engineering News
Mining Weekly
Research Channel Africa

Read more

Subscriptions

We offer a variety of subscriptions to our Magazine, Website, PDF Reports and our photo library.

Subscriptions are available via the Creamer Media Store.

View store

Advertise

Advertising on Polity.org.za is an effective way to build and consolidate a company's profile among clients and prospective clients. Email advertising@creamermedia.co.za

View options
Free daily email newsletter Register Now