https://www.polity.org.za
Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
Home / Statements RSS ← Back
Close

Email this article

separate emails by commas, maximum limit of 4 addresses

Sponsored by

Close

Embed Video

ANC: Statement by the Office of the ANC Chief Whip, notes the response of the Public Protector to our criticism of her decision to send a letter to President Zuma (26/08/2014)

ANC: Statement by the Office of the ANC Chief Whip, notes the response of the Public Protector to our criticism of her decision to send a letter to President Zuma (26/08/2014)
Photo by Reuters

26th August 2014

SAVE THIS ARTICLE      EMAIL THIS ARTICLE

Font size: -+

/ MEDIA STATEMENT / The content on this page is not written by Polity.org.za, but is supplied by third parties. This content does not constitute news reporting by Polity.org.za.

The Office of the ANC Chief Whip notes the response of the Public
Protector to our criticism of her decision to send a letter to the
President. We vehemently reject her wild and baseless accusation that we
don’t respect the Constitution and that we are interfering in her lawful
duties. It has become that Office’s habit to label and demonise those
who disagree with it on matters of principle.

We remain unfazed and firm in our belief that, by directly writing to
the President regarding his report which is currently before a process
of Parliament, she has demonstrated disregard for the authority of
Parliament and lack of confidence in its lawful processes.

The Public Protector’s response, as expected, belabours allegations and
labels, but fails to deal with simple, principled and direct issues we
have raised:

1. How does the Public Protector reconcile her earlier constitutionally
and procedurally sound position to allow a Parliamentary process to take
its course with her letter to the President complaining about the
alleged inadequacy of his report?

2. By writing to the President regarding the “Secure in Comfort” report –
which she has concluded and is now ready for formal consideration by
Parliament – she is encroaching on the constitutional authority of the
institution. Essentially, her action establishes a parallel process that
not only duplicates the work of the ad hoc committee but also renders
the parliamentary process meaningless. Our constitutional institutions
ought to respect and complement each other’s powers and functions rather
than compete and undermine each other.

The Public Protector, like any South African, has the right to disagree
and criticise our views. However, she should at least attempt to provide
the nation with clarify regarding the principled matters we have raised.
Her yesterday’s statement, although lengthy, has regrettably left the
public none the wiser.
 

Advertisement

EMAIL THIS ARTICLE      SAVE THIS ARTICLE

To subscribe email subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za or click here
To advertise email advertising@creamermedia.co.za or click here

Comment Guidelines

 

About

Polity.org.za is a product of Creamer Media.
www.creamermedia.co.za

Other Creamer Media Products include:
Engineering News
Mining Weekly
Research Channel Africa

Read more

Subscriptions

We offer a variety of subscriptions to our Magazine, Website, PDF Reports and our photo library.

Subscriptions are available via the Creamer Media Store.

View store

Advertise

Advertising on Polity.org.za is an effective way to build and consolidate a company's profile among clients and prospective clients. Email advertising@creamermedia.co.za

View options
Free daily email newsletter Register Now